» Articles » PMID: 37493981

Assessing the Readability of Online Health Information for Colonoscopy - Analysis of Articles in 22 European Languages

Overview
Journal J Cancer Educ
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Jul 26
PMID 37493981
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patients often search on the Internet information about different medical conditions and procedures. This study aimed to evaluate online health information on colonoscopy, focusing on quantity and comprehensibility of internet resources dedicated to the colonoscopy. This information could be used by European Union (EU) colorectal cancer (CRC) screening providers to address patient's unfilled educational needs, fear of colonoscopy, and other barriers that deter from CRC screening. The term "colonoscopy" translated into 22 official EU languages was searched using the Google search engine. For each translation, generated list of websites was assessed with Google Translate. The first 50 websites in each language were assessed for suitability. Records in other languages were excluded. Included websites were free, focused on patient education, and did not have password. Readability assessments were performed with Lix score. A total of 588 websites in Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, and Swedish were evaluated. The overall mean Lix score was 56 ± 8 and was classified as very hard to comprehend. There were significant differences in mean Lix scores across the included languages (P<.001). There was not significant correlation (R = 0.1, P = 0.142) between Lix score and number of search hits. Although there was a wealth of online patient information on colonoscopy, the comprehensibility of the available information is low. Physician guidance to reliable resources could increase patient's willingness to undergo a screening colonoscopy.

Citing Articles

AI in Dental Radiology-Improving the Efficiency of Reporting With ChatGPT: Comparative Study.

Stephan D, Bertsch A, Burwinkel M, Vinayahalingam S, Al-Nawas B, Kammerer P J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26():e60684.

PMID: 39714078 PMC: 11704643. DOI: 10.2196/60684.


Readability Metrics in Patient Education: Where Do We Innovate?.

Singh S, Jamal A, Qureshi F Clin Pract. 2024; 14(6):2341-2349.

PMID: 39585011 PMC: 11586978. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14060183.


Hidradenitis Suppurativa Online Documents Readability: An Analysis Including 23 European Languages.

Skrzypczak T, Skrzypczak A, Szepietowski J Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024; 17:853-862.

PMID: 38644990 PMC: 11032155. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S463861.


Readability of Patient Electronic Materials for Atopic Dermatitis in 23 Languages: Analysis and Implications for Dermatologists.

Skrzypczak T, Skrzypczak A, Szepietowski J Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024; 14(3):671-684.

PMID: 38402338 PMC: 10965833. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01115-1.

References
1.
MacLean S, Basch C, Clark A, Basch C . Readability of information on colonoscopy preparation on the internet. Health Promot Perspect. 2018; 8(2):167-170. PMC: 5935822. DOI: 10.15171/hpp.2018.22. View

2.
Wasserman M, Baxter N, Rosen B, Burnstein M, Halverson A . Systematic review of internet patient information on colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013; 57(1):64-9. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000011. View

3.
Grewal P, Alagaratnam S . The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet. Int J Surg. 2013; 11(5):410-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.03.006. View

4.
Garfinkle R, Wong-Chong N, Petrucci A, Sylla P, Wexner S, Bhatnagar S . Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2019; 21(5):523-531. DOI: 10.1111/codi.14548. View

5.
Benard F, Barkun A, Martel M, von Renteln D . Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations. World J Gastroenterol. 2018; 24(1):124-138. PMC: 5757117. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124. View