» Articles » PMID: 37493938

Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection: Current Clinical Management and Microbiome-Based Therapies

Overview
Journal BioDrugs
Date 2023 Jul 26
PMID 37493938
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clostridioides difficile is one of the most important causes of healthcare-associated diarrhea. The high incidence and recurrence rates of C. difficile infection, as well as its associated morbidity and mortality, are great concerns. The most common complication of C. difficile infection is recurrence, with rates of 20-30% after a primary infection and 60% after three or more episodes. Medical management of recurrent C. difficile infection involves a choice of therapy that is different from the antibiotic used in the primary episode. Patients with recurrent C. difficile infection also benefit from fecal microbiota transplantation or standardized microbiome restoration therapies (approved or experimental) to restore eubiosis. In contrast to antibiotics, microbiome restoration therapies restore a normal gut flora and eliminate C. difficile colonization and infection. Fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent C. difficile infection has demonstrated higher success rates than vancomycin, fidaxomicin, or placebo. Fecal microbiota transplantation has traditionally been considered safe, with the most common adverse reactions being abdominal discomfort, and diarrhea, and rare serious adverse events. Significant heterogeneity and a lack of standardization regarding the process of preparation, and administration of fecal microbiota transplantation remain a major pitfall. Standardized microbiome-based therapies provide a promising alternative. In the ECOSPOR III trial of SER-109, an oral formulation of bacterial spores, a significant reduction in the recurrence rate (12%) was observed compared with placebo (40%). In the phase III PUNCH CD3 trial, RBX2660 also demonstrated high efficacy rates of 70.6% versus 57.5%. Both these agents are now US Food and Drug Administration approved for recurrent C. difficile infection. Other standardized microbiome-based therapies currently in the pipeline are VE303, RBX7455, and MET-2. Antibiotic neutralization strategies, vaccines, passive monoclonal antibodies, and drug repurposing are other therapeutic strategies being explored to treat C. difficile infection.

Citing Articles

Body mass index changes after fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent infection.

Sehgal K, Berry P, Cho J, Saffouri G, Dierkhising R, Battaglioli E Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025; 18:17562848251321121.

PMID: 39996135 PMC: 11848891. DOI: 10.1177/17562848251321121.


The evolving landscape of live biotherapeutics in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection.

Berry P, Khanna S Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025; .

PMID: 39821715 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-024-01717-9.


Therapeutics involved in managing initial and recurrent infection: An updated literature review.

Nagesh V, Tran H, Elias D, Kianifar Aguilar I, Sethi T, Menon A World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2024; 15(5):95467.

PMID: 39281262 PMC: 11401021. DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v15.i5.95467.


Validation of Lyophilized Human Fecal Microbiota for the Treatment of Infection: A Pilot Study with Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of a Middle-Income Country-Promicrobioma Project.

Yamada C, Ortis G, Buso G, Martins T, Zequinao T, Telles J Microorganisms. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39203583 PMC: 11356882. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12081741.


Alternative treatment of recurrent infection in adults by fecal transplantation: an overview of phase I-IV studies from Clinicaltrials.gov.

Obaid N Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1374774.

PMID: 38784794 PMC: 11111976. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1374774.


References
1.
Dubberke E, Olsen M . Burden of Clostridium difficile on the healthcare system. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 55 Suppl 2:S88-92. PMC: 3388018. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis335. View

2.
McGlone S, Bailey R, Zimmer S, Popovich M, Tian Y, Ufberg P . The economic burden of Clostridium difficile. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011; 18(3):282-9. PMC: 3763211. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03571.x. View

3.
Borren N, Ghadermarzi S, Hutfless S, Ananthakrishnan A . The emergence of Clostridium difficile infection in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence and impact. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0176797. PMC: 5413003. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176797. View

4.
Reveles K, Pugh M, Lawson K, Mortensen E, Koeller J, Argamany J . Shift to community-onset Clostridium difficile infection in the national Veterans Health Administration, 2003-2014. Am J Infect Control. 2017; 46(4):431-435. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.09.020. View

5.
Fellmeth G, Yarlagadda S, Iyer S . Epidemiology of community-onset Clostridium difficile infection in a community in the South of England. J Infect Public Health. 2010; 3(3):118-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2010.07.002. View