6.
Rangaprakash D, Tadayonnejad R, Deshpande G, ONeill J, Feusner J
. FMRI hemodynamic response function (HRF) as a novel marker of brain function: applications for understanding obsessive-compulsive disorder pathology and treatment response. Brain Imaging Behav. 2020; 15(3):1622-1640.
PMC: 7865013.
DOI: 10.1007/s11682-020-00358-8.
View
7.
Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney D, Gokaslan Z, Shi W, Demonte F
. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg. 2002; 95(2):190-8.
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190.
View
8.
Bielczyk N, Llera A, Buitelaar J, Glennon J, Beckmann C
. The impact of hemodynamic variability and signal mixing on the identifiability of effective connectivity structures in BOLD fMRI. Brain Behav. 2017; 7(8):e00777.
PMC: 5561328.
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.777.
View
9.
Menon R, Ogawa S, Tank D, Ugurbil K
. Tesla gradient recalled echo characteristics of photic stimulation-induced signal changes in the human primary visual cortex. Magn Reson Med. 1993; 30(3):380-6.
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910300317.
View
10.
Yakupov R, Lei J, Hoffmann M, Speck O
. False fMRI activation after motion correction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017; 38(9):4497-4510.
PMC: 5553448.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23677.
View
11.
Hong N, Yoo H, Gwak H, Shin S, Lee S
. Outcome of surgical resection of symptomatic cerebral lesions in non-small cell lung cancer patients with multiple brain metastases. Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2014; 1(2):64-70.
PMC: 4027112.
DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2013.1.2.64.
View
12.
Sanai N, Mirzadeh Z, Berger M
. Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(1):18-27.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa067819.
View
13.
Lemee J, Berro D, Bernard F, Chinier E, Leiber L, Menei P
. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging versus task-based activity for language mapping and correlation with perioperative cortical mapping. Brain Behav. 2019; 9(10):e01362.
PMC: 6790308.
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1362.
View
14.
Lindquist M, Wager T
. Validity and power in hemodynamic response modeling: a comparison study and a new approach. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006; 28(8):764-84.
PMC: 3318967.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20310.
View
15.
Lindquist M, Loh J, Atlas L, Wager T
. Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: efficiency, bias and mis-modeling. Neuroimage. 2008; 45(1 Suppl):S187-98.
PMC: 3318970.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.065.
View
16.
Aguirre G, Zarahn E, DEsposito M
. The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage. 1998; 8(4):360-9.
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0369.
View
17.
Benjamin C, Walshaw P, Hale K, Gaillard W, Baxter L, Berl M
. Presurgical language fMRI: Mapping of six critical regions. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017; 38(8):4239-4255.
PMC: 5518223.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23661.
View
18.
Duffau H
. Long-term outcomes after supratotal resection of diffuse low-grade gliomas: a consecutive series with 11-year follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015; 158(1):51-8.
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-015-2621-3.
View
19.
Gross W, Helfand A, Swanson S, Conant L, Humphries C, Raghavan M
. Prediction of Naming Outcome With fMRI Language Lateralization in Left Temporal Epilepsy Surgery. Neurology. 2022; 98(23):e2337-e2346.
PMC: 9202528.
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200552.
View
20.
Benjamin C, Dhingra I, Li A, Blumenfeld H, Alkawadri R, Bickel S
. Presurgical language fMRI: Technical practices in epilepsy surgical planning. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 39(10):4032-4042.
PMC: 6175127.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24229.
View