The Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy for Critically Injured Patients (RESTRIC) Trial: a Cluster-randomized, Crossover, Non-inferiority Multicenter Trial of Restrictive Transfusion in Trauma
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The efficacies of fresh frozen plasma and coagulation factor transfusion have been widely evaluated in trauma-induced coagulopathy management during the acute post-injury phase. However, the efficacy of red blood cell transfusion has not been adequately investigated in patients with severe trauma, and the optimal hemoglobin target level during the acute post-injury and resuscitation phases remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether a restrictive transfusion strategy was clinically non-inferior to a liberal transfusion strategy during the acute post-injury phase.
Methods: This cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial was conducted at 22 tertiary emergency medical institutions in Japan and included adult patients with severe trauma at risk of major bleeding. The institutions were allocated a restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy (target hemoglobin levels: 7-9 or 10-12 g/dL, respectively). The strategies were applied to patients immediately after arrival at the emergency department. The primary outcome was 28-day survival after arrival at the emergency department. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, complication rates, and event-free days. The non-inferiority margin was set at 3%.
Results: The 28-day survival rates of patients in the restrictive (n = 216) and liberal (n = 195) strategy groups were 92.1% and 91.3%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for 28-day survival in the restrictive versus liberal strategy group was 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.13). Significant non-inferiority was not observed. Transfusion volumes and hemoglobin levels were lower in the restrictive strategy group than in the liberal strategy group. No between-group differences were noted in complication rates or event-free days.
Conclusions: Although non-inferiority of the restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for 28-day survival was not statistically significant, the mortality and complication rates were similar between the groups. The restrictive transfusion strategy results in a lower transfusion volume.
Trial Registration Number: umin.ac.jp/ctr: UMIN000034405, registration date: 8 October 2018.
Real-world efficacy of transfusion with liberal or restrictive strategy in traumatic brain injury.
Cui L, Liu N, Yu C, Fang M, Huang R, Zhang C Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024; 12(1):203-212.
PMID: 39729630 PMC: 11752087. DOI: 10.1002/acn3.52272.
Aoki M, Fukushima K, Hayakawa M, Kudo D, Tagami T, Oshima K Acute Med Surg. 2024; 11(1):e70016.
PMID: 39503015 PMC: 11536327. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.70016.
de Santis G, Costa L, Brunetta D, Magnus M, Benites B, Rodrigues R Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2024; 46 Suppl 1:S67-S71.
PMID: 38604928 PMC: 11069063. DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2024.02.018.
Is Vesicular Therapy the Newcomer That Matters for the Medicine of Tomorrow?.
Velot E, Bianchi A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(6).
PMID: 38542502 PMC: 10970723. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25063530.
Kosaki Y, Hongo T, Hayakawa M, Kudo D, Kushimoto S, Tagami T World J Emerg Surg. 2024; 19(1):1.
PMID: 38167057 PMC: 10763143. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00530-7.