Nucleus High Intensity in the T2-weighted MRI is a Potential Predictor of Annulus Tear in Cervical Injured Patients: a Case Comparative Study

Overview

Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology

Date 2023 Jul 24

PMID 37488519

Authors

Shengyu Wan

Jian Zhang

Chao Wu

Xu Lin

Jingchi Li

Fan Wu

Zifan Zhang

Lipeng He

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Segmental fusion operations assume paramount significance for individuals afflicted by full layers of annulus tears as they avert the perils of rapid disc degeneration and segmental instability. Structures with high signal intensity in the T2-weighted MRI can predict potential damage to the injured segment. Since local structures are shortly related biomechanically, this may be an effective predictor for annulus tears.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 57 patients afflicted by cervical injuries and subjected to single-segment ACDF has been performed in this study. The surgeon performed intraoperative exploration to assess the integration status of the annulus. The signal intensity of the prevertebral space, nucleus, and injured vertebral bodies were judged in the T2-weighted imaging data. Regression analyses identified independent predictors for annulus tears, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was computed to evaluate the predictive performance of potential independent predictors.

Results: The occurrence of nucleus high intensity was significantly higher among individuals with annulus tears, and the nucleus high intensity was deemed an independent predictor for determining the presence of intraoperative visible annulus tears in patients with cervical injuries. AUC for nucleus high intensity was calculated as 0.717, with a corresponding p-value less than 0.05.

Conclusions: In the realm of diagnosing annulus tears in injured cervical patients, nucleus high intensity in the T2-weighted MRI emerges as a promising predictive factor. Notably, this applies specifically to patients devoid of fracture and visible annulus tears in their MRI scans. Such positive outcomes should be regarded as prospective indications for ACDF.

References

Trattnig S, Stelzeneder D, Goed S, Reissegger M, Mamisch T, Paternostro-Sluga T . Lumbar intervertebral disc abnormalities: comparison of quantitative T2 mapping with conventional MR at 3.0 T. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20(11):2715-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1843-2. View

Nouda S, Tomita S, Kin A, Kawahara K, Kinoshita M . Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement: biomechanical evaluation of the cadaveric spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(24):2613-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181abc150. View

Sedaghat S, Langguth P, Larsen N, Campbell G, Both M, Jansen O . Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Layer Spectral CT Using Electron Density Images to Detect Post-Traumatic Prevertebral Hematoma of the Cervical Spine. Rofo. 2021; 193(12):1445-1450. DOI: 10.1055/a-1529-7010. View

Yeung A, Yeung C . In-vivo endoscopic visualization of patho-anatomy in painful degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Surg Technol Int. 2006; 15:243-56. View

Sharma A, Lancaster S, Bagade S, Hildebolt C . Early pattern of degenerative changes in individual components of intervertebral discs in stressed and nonstressed segments of lumbar spine: an in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(13):1084-90. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000265. View

Ellis D, Ehsanian R, Shin P, Rivers W . Lumbar Annular High-Intensity Zone as a Precursor to Disc Extrusion. Cureus. 2022; 13(12):e20111. PMC: 8720284. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20111. View

Adams M, Roughley P . What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(18):2151-61. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000231761.73859.2c. View

Ying J, Teng H, Qian Y, Hu Y, Wen T, Ruan D . Radiographic analysis of the correlation between ossification of the nuchal ligament and sagittal alignment and segmental stability of the cervical spine in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Radiol. 2018; 60(2):196-203. DOI: 10.1177/0284185118778866. View

Feng G . [Logistic regression analysis in observational study]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2019; 40(8):1006-1009. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2019.08.025. View

10.

Bermel E, Barocas V, Ellingson A . The role of the facet capsular ligament in providing spinal stability. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2019; 21(13):712-721. PMC: 6366332. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1514392. View

11.

Przybyla A, Pollintine P, Bedzinski R, Adams M . Outer annulus tears have less effect than endplate fracture on stress distributions inside intervertebral discs: relevance to disc degeneration. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006; 21(10):1013-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.07.003. View

12.

Li J, Yang Z, Xie T, Song Z, Song Y, Zeng J . Deterioration of the fixation segment's stress distribution and the strength reduction of screw holding position together cause screw loosening in ALSR fixed OLIF patients with poor BMD. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:922848. PMC: 9468878. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.922848. View

13.

Chang H, Ku J, Ku J, Kuo Y, Chang C, Wu C . Correlation of bone density to screw loosening in dynamic stabilization: an analysis of 176 patients. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):17519. PMC: 8410763. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95232-y. View

14.

Yang H, Liu H, Li Z, Zhang K, Wang J, Wang H . Low back pain associated with lumbar disc herniation: role of moderately degenerative disc and annulus fibrous tears. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(2):1634-44. PMC: 4402739. View

15.

Ji C, Rong Y, Wang J, Yu S, Yin G, Fan J . Risk Factors for Refracture following Primary Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures. Pain Physician. 2021; 24(3):E335-E340. View

16.

Zhou Y, Teng H, Wang J, Zhu M, Li C . [Cervical single open door laminoplasty with lateral mass screw fixation for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with cervical instability]. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017; 29(10):943-946. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.10.013. View

17.

Acosta Jr F, Lotz J, Ames C . The potential role of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for intervertebral disc degeneration: a critical overview. Neurosurg Focus. 2005; 19(3):E4. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2005.19.3.5. View

18.

Urits I, Burshtein A, Sharma M, Testa L, Gold P, Orhurhu V . Low Back Pain, a Comprehensive Review: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019; 23(3):23. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-019-0757-1. View

19.

Xu B, Xia Q, Ma X, Yang Q, Ji N, Shah S . The usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for sequestered lumbar disc herniation treated with endoscopic surgery. J Xray Sci Technol. 2012; 20(3):373-81. DOI: 10.3233/XST-2012-0336. View

20.

Komatsubara T, Tokioka T, Sugimoto Y, Ozaki T . Minimally Invasive Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation by a Posterolateral Approach for Acute Cervical Injury. Clin Spine Surg. 2016; 30(10):466-469. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000421. View