» Articles » PMID: 37485260

Predicting the Risk of Iliofemoral Vascular Complication in Complex Transfemoral-TAVR Using New Generation Transcatheter Devices

Abstract

Objective: Design a predictive risk model for minimizing iliofemoral vascular complications (IVC) in a contemporary era of transfemoral-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR).

Background: IVC remains a common complication of TF-TAVR despite the technological improvement in the new-generation transcatheter systems (NGTS) and enclosed poor outcomes and quality of life. Currently, there is no accepted tool to assess the IVC risk for calcified and tortuous vessels.

Methods: We reconstructed CT images of 516 propensity-matched TF-TAVR patients using the NGTS to design a predictive anatomical model for IVC and validated it on a new cohort of 609 patients. Age, sex, peripheral artery disease, valve size, and type were used to balance the matched cohort.

Results: IVC occurred in 214 (7.2%) patients. Sheath size ( = 0.02), the sum of angles (SOA) ( < .0001), number of curves (NOC) ( < .0001), minimal lumen diameter (MLD) ( < .001), and sheath-to-femoral artery diameter ratio (SFAR) ( = 0.012) were significant predictors for IVC. An indexed risk score (CSI) consisting of multiplying the SOA and NOC divided by the MLD showed 84.3% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity, when set to >100, in predicting IVC (C-stat 0.936, 95% CI 0.911-0.959,  < 0.001). Adding SFAR > 1.00 in a tree model increased the overall accuracy to 97.7%. In the validation cohort, the model predicted 89.5% of the IVC cases with an overall 89.5% sensitivity, 98.9% specificity, and 94.2% accuracy (C-stat 0.842, 95% CI 0.904-0.980,  < .0001).

Conclusion: Our CT-based validated-model is the most accurate and easy-to-use tool assessing IVC risk and should be used for calcified and tortuous vessels in preprocedural planning.

Citing Articles

The role of external iliac artery diameter indexed to BSA score in predicting vascular access complications after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Gruz-Kwapisz M, Gasior T, Hajder A, Wanha W, Ciosek J, Ochala A Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024; 20(1):76-83.

PMID: 38616934 PMC: 11008513. DOI: 10.5114/aic.2024.136407.


See It Best: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided versus Blind Femoral Artery Puncture in Balloon-Expandable TAVI.

Gennari M, Maccarana A, Severgnini G, Iennaco V, Bonomi A, Capra N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592382 PMC: 10935327. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051514.


Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Access Sites: Same Goals, Distinct Aspects, Various Merits and Demerits.

Katsaros O, Apostolos A, Ktenopoulos N, Koliastasis L, Kachrimanidis I, Drakopoulou M J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38248874 PMC: 10817029. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11010004.

References
1.
Mach M, Okutucu S, Kerbel T, Arjomand A, Fatihoglu S, Werner P . Vascular Complications in TAVR: Incidence, Clinical Impact, and Management. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(21). PMC: 8584339. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215046. View

2.
Lu H, Monney P, Hullin R, Fournier S, Roguelov C, Eeckhout E . Transcarotid Access Versus Transfemoral Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:687168. PMC: 8190826. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.687168. View

3.
Otto C, Kumbhani D, Alexander K, Calhoon J, Desai M, Kaul S . 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Management of Adults With Aortic Stenosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69(10):1313-1346. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.12.006. View

4.
Van Mieghem N, Tchetche D, Chieffo A, Dumonteil N, Messika-Zeitoun D, van der Boon R . Incidence, predictors, and implications of access site complications with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2012; 110(9):1361-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.06.042. View

5.
Essa E, Makki N, Bittenbender P, Capers 4th Q, George B, Rushing G . Vascular Assessment for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Intravascular Ultrasound Compared With Computed Tomography. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016; 28(12):E172-E178. View