» Articles » PMID: 37483957

Effectiveness of a Modified Balint Group Process on Empathy and Psychological Skills Employing Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Framework

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2023 Jul 24
PMID 37483957
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To evaluate, using Kirkpatrick's evaluation model, a modified Balint group (BG) by adding 5-10 min at the end of the session, where the facilitators will debrief the residents about critical themes mentioned in the session.

Methods: A quasi-experimental study with a mixed-method design was conducted among family medicine residents over 1 year, using focus groups and validated tools filled by residents and their corresponding patients. The residents' empathy through self and patient evaluation, psychological skills, and satisfaction with the educational activity were measured.

Results: The focus group revealed that the residents were aware of the change and considered it a closure to the encounter, helping decrease some uncertainty. Most of the residents did not consider the change helpful. Using validated instruments, BG was ineffective at improving the residents' empathy and psychological skills. There was a statistically significant main effect of time on Psychological Medicine Inventory (PMI) scores, F (1,13) = 7.709, = 0.016.

Conclusion: Debriefing at the end of BG by the facilitators about key themes may help give the residents closure, decrease the uncertainty, and make them more aware of their feelings. Nevertheless, Balint groups are still not very well accepted by the residents, and they prefer direct feedback and support groups.

Citing Articles

The effectiveness of Balint groups at improving empathy in medical and nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Gong B, Zhang X, Lu C, Wu C, Yang J BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1089.

PMID: 39363356 PMC: 11451191. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06098-3.


Professional identity and its associated psychosocial factors among physicians from standardized residency training programs in China: a national cross-sectional study.

Zeng Z, Lu Z, Zeng X, Gan Y, Jiang J, Chen Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1413126.

PMID: 39267967 PMC: 11390412. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1413126.

References
1.
Smith M, Anandarajah G . Mutiny on the balint: balancing resident developmental needs with the balint process. Fam Med. 2007; 39(7):495-7. View

2.
Kjeldmand D, Holmstrom I, Rosenqvist U . Balint training makes GPs thrive better in their job. Patient Educ Couns. 2004; 55(2):230-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.009. View

3.
Bikker A, Fitzpatrick B, Murphy D, Forster L, Mercer S . Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses' consultations. BMC Nurs. 2017; 16:71. PMC: 5702142. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-017-0265-8. View

4.
Merenstein J, Chillag K . Balint seminar leaders: what do they do?. Fam Med. 1999; 31(3):182-6. View

5.
Antoun J, Johnson A, Clive B, Romani M . Doctors at times of national instability: What Balint seminars reveal. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2018; 54(1):3-10. DOI: 10.1177/0091217418791449. View