» Articles » PMID: 37483923

How and Why Pharmaceutical Reforms Contribute to Universal Health Coverage Through Improving Equitable Access to Medicines: a Case of Ghana

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Jul 24
PMID 37483923
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Examining how and why a country prioritizes and implements pharmaceutical reforms tends to show complex processes and myriad efforts made toward improving access to medicines. This study examines factors that enabled the prioritization and implementation of selected pharmaceutical reform items and how these factors contributed to improving equitable access to medicines and universal health coverage in Ghana.

Methods: An analytical framework was developed to identify variables to explore in answering the study questions and frame the analysis and presentation of findings. Documents analyzed included the National Medicines Policies, Health Sector Program of Work, and other health policies. Quantitative data were sourced from databases maintained by World Health Organization and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.

Results: The three main factors, evidence, financial and technical support, and alignment to national and global policies, influenced the prioritization and implementation of access to medicines reforms. The reforms targeted rational selection and use of medicines, medicine pricing, sustainable medicine financing, and regulatory and supply chain systems. Although there were limited quantitative data to quantify access to medicine policies" impact on universal health coverage, it can be reasonably assumed that, in Ghana, access to medicine policies has contributed to financial protection and improved access to quality health services.

Conclusion: Access to medicine policies targeted at promoting rational medicine selection and use, regulating medicine pricing and improving sustainable financing for medicines as well as the regulatory and supply chain systems arguably contributed to the attainment of UHC and must be sustained. Therefore, data collection and reporting indicators for access to medicines must be prioritized.

References
1.
Gotham D, Onarheim K, Barber M . How the MDGs gave up on measuring access to medicines. Lancet Glob Health. 2016; 4(5):e296-7. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)00066-8. View

2.
Perehudoff K, Demchenko I, Alexandrov N, Brutsaert D, Ackon A, Duran C . Essential Medicines in Universal Health Coverage: A Scoping Review of Public Health Law Interventions and How They Are Measured in Five Middle-Income Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(24). PMC: 7765934. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249524. View

3.
Luiza V, Mendes L, Tavares N, Bertoldi A, Fontanella A, Oliveira M . Inappropriate use of medicines and associated factors in Brazil: an approach from a national household survey. Health Policy Plan. 2019; 34(Supplement_3):iii27-iii35. PMC: 6901078. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz038. View

4.
Chebolu-Subramanian V, Sundarraj R . Essential medicine shortages, procurement process and supplier response: A normative study across Indian states. Soc Sci Med. 2021; 278:113926. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113926. View

5.
Zhang C, Rahman M, Rahman M, Yawson A, Shibuya K . Trends and projections of universal health coverage indicators in Ghana, 1995-2030: A national and subnational study. PLoS One. 2019; 14(5):e0209126. PMC: 6530887. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209126. View