» Articles » PMID: 37483262

Risk Profiles of New Users of Oral Anticoagulants Between 2011 and 2019 in Germany

Overview
Journal Clin Epidemiol
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Jul 24
PMID 37483262
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Over the last decade, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has strongly increased. We aimed to describe and compare risk profiles including potential changes over time among persons with non-valvular atrial fibrillation initiating treatment with different DOACs or phenprocoumon (vitamin K antagonist) between 2011 and 2019 in Germany.

Patients And Methods: Using the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD; claims data of ~20% of the German population), we identified persons with a first dispensing of phenprocoumon or a DOAC and a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation between August 2011 and December 2019. We described the morbidity of included patients prior to treatment initiation, stratified by year of treatment initiation.

Results: Overall, we included 448,028 new users (phenprocoumon: N = 118,117, rivaroxaban: N = 130,997, apixaban: N = 130,300, edoxaban: N = 38,128, dabigatran: N = 30,486). Comparing new DOAC users in 2019, the proportion with prior ischemic stroke was highest for dabigatran (17%) and lowest for rivaroxaban (8%). The proportion with prior major bleeding was also highest for dabigatran (25%) and lowest for edoxaban (20%). New users of apixaban were oldest and, eg, showed the highest prevalence of congestive heart failure. Changes over time were most pronounced for phenprocoumon. For example, among persons initiating phenprocoumon in 2012 vs 2019, the proportion with prior major bleeding increased from 18% to 35%; the proportion with renal disease increased from 20% to 36% and the proportion with liver disease from 18% to 24%.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated differences in risk profiles between new users of different oral anticoagulants and substantial changes over time among new phenprocoumon users. These differences have to be considered in head-to-head comparisons of these drugs based on observational data, especially regarding potential unmeasured confounding.

Citing Articles

Challenges and lessons learned from a long-term postauthorisation safety study programme of rivaroxaban in Europe.

Brobert G, Ruigomez A, Schink T, Voss A, Herings R, Smits E BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e081348.

PMID: 38531587 PMC: 10966716. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081348.

References
1.
Friberg L, Oldgren J . Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. Open Heart. 2017; 4(2):e000682. PMC: 5623334. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000682. View

2.
Lip G, Frison L, Halperin J, Lane D . Comparative validation of a novel risk score for predicting bleeding risk in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: the HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR,.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 57(2):173-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.024. View

3.
Gupta K, Trocio J, Keshishian A, Zhang Q, Dina O, Mardekian J . Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019; 19(1):142. PMC: 6567643. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-019-1116-1. View

4.
Paschke L, Klimke K, Altiner A, von Stillfried D, Schulz M . Comparing stroke prevention therapy of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide retrospective observational study. BMC Med. 2020; 18(1):254. PMC: 7450597. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01695-7. View

5.
Laliberte F, Cloutier M, Nelson W, Coleman C, Pilon D, Olson W . Real-world comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014; 30(7):1317-25. DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2014.907140. View