» Articles » PMID: 37479225

Characterizing Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Improvement Following De Novo Catheter Ablation

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) symptom relief is a primary indication for catheter ablation, but AF symptom resolution is not well characterized. The study objective was to describe AF symptom documentation in electronic health records (EHRs) pre- and post-ablation and identify correlates of post-ablation symptoms.

Methods And Results: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using EHRs of patients with AF (n = 1293), undergoing ablation in a large, urban health system from 2010 to 2020. We extracted symptom data from clinical notes using a natural language processing algorithm (F score: 0.81). We used Cochran's Q tests with post-hoc McNemar's tests to determine differences in symptom prevalence pre- and post-ablation. We used logistic regression models to estimate the adjusted odds of symptom resolution by personal or clinical characteristics at 6 and 12 months post-ablation. In fully adjusted models, at 12 months post-ablation patients, patients with heart failure had significantly lower odds of dyspnoea resolution [odds ratio (OR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.57], oedema resolution (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25-0.56), and fatigue resolution (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.85), but higher odds of palpitations resolution (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.25-2.89) compared with those without heart failure. Age 65 and older, female sex, Black or African American race, smoking history, and antiarrhythmic use were also associated with lower odds of resolution of specific symptoms at 6 and 12 months.

Conclusion: The post-ablation symptom patterns are heterogeneous. Findings warrant confirmation with larger, more representative data sets, which may be informative for patients whose primary goal for undergoing an ablation is symptom relief.

Citing Articles

Associations between atrial fibrillation symptom clusters and major adverse cardiovascular events following catheter ablation.

Scharp D, Zhao Y, Van Bulck L, Volodarskiy A, Slotwiner D, Reading Turchioe M Heart Rhythm O2. 2024; 5(10):741-743.

PMID: 39524058 PMC: 11549503. DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.08.013.


Exploring the full potential of the electronic health record: the application of natural language processing for clinical practice.

Van Bulck L, Reading Turchioe M, Topaz M, Song J Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024; 24(2):332-337.

PMID: 38912955 PMC: 11879152. DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvae091.

References
1.
Weiskopf N, Weng C . Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012; 20(1):144-51. PMC: 3555312. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681. View

2.
Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A . Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 94(3):291-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031. View

3.
Reading Turchioe M, Volodarskiy A, Pathak J, Wright D, Tcheng J, Slotwiner D . Systematic review of current natural language processing methods and applications in cardiology. Heart. 2021; 108(12):909-916. PMC: 9046466. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319769. View

4.
Man-Son-Hing M, Gage B, Montgomery A, Howitt A, Thomson R, Devereaux P . Preference-based antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: implications for clinical decision making. Med Decis Making. 2005; 25(5):548-59. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05280558. View

5.
Thomson R, Robinson A, Greenaway J, Lowe P . Development and description of a decision analysis based decision support tool for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002; 11(1):25-31. PMC: 1743557. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.25. View