» Articles » PMID: 37476303

Application of IPSET-thrombosis in 1366 Patients Prospectively Followed From the Spanish Registry of Essential Thrombocythemia

Abstract

The International Prognostic Score of thrombosis in Essential Thrombocythemia (IPSET-thrombosis) and its revised version have been proposed to guide thrombosis prevention strategies. We evaluated both classifications to prognosticate thrombosis in 1366 contemporary essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients prospectively followed from the Spanish Registry of ET. The cumulative incidence of thrombosis at 10 years, taking death as a competing risk, was 11.4%. The risk of thrombosis was significantly higher in the high-risk IPSET-thrombosis and high-risk revised IPSET-thrombosis, but no differences were observed among the lower risk categories. Patients allocated in high-risk IPSET-thrombosis (subdistribution hazard ratios [SHR], 3.7 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.6-8.7]) and high-risk revised IPSET-thrombosis (SHR, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.4-7.45]) showed an increased risk of arterial thrombosis, whereas both scoring systems failed to predict venous thrombosis. The incidence rate of thrombosis in intermediate risk revised IPSET-thrombosis (aged >60 years, -negative, and no history of thrombosis) was very low regardless of the treatment administered (0.9% and 0% per year with and without cytoreduction, respectively). Dynamic application of the revised IPSET-thrombosis showed a low rate of thrombosis when patients without history of prior thrombosis switched to a higher risk category after reaching 60 years of age. In conclusion, IPSET-thrombosis scores are useful for identifying patients at high risk of arterial thrombosis, whereas they fail to predict venous thrombosis. Controlled studies are needed to determine the appropriate treatment of ET patients assigned to the non-high-risk categories.

Citing Articles

The clinical significance of TAT, PIC, TM, and t-PAIC in vascular events of BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Huang K, Mo Q, Liao C, Feng S, Liu G, Jiang D Clin Exp Med. 2024; 24(1):107.

PMID: 38776019 PMC: 11111525. DOI: 10.1007/s10238-024-01371-7.


Case report: Peri-procedural hydroxyurea helps minimize bleeding in patients with Essential Thrombocythemia associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome.

Kogan L, Price R, Kotchetkov R Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1326209.

PMID: 38361779 PMC: 10867169. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1326209.


One thousand patients with essential thrombocythemia: the Florence-CRIMM experience.

Loscocco G, Gesullo F, Capecchi G, Atanasio A, Maccari C, Mannelli F Blood Cancer J. 2024; 14(1):10.

PMID: 38238287 PMC: 10796728. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00968-7.

References
1.
. SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(25):2439-2454. PMC: 8248998. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab309. View

2.
Barbui T, Tefferi A, Vannucchi A, Passamonti F, Silver R, Hoffman R . Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. Leukemia. 2018; 32(5):1057-1069. PMC: 5986069. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0077-1. View

3.
Buxhofer-Ausch V, Wolf D, Sormann S, Forjan E, Schimetta W, Gisslinger B . Impact of platelets on major thrombosis in patients with a normal white blood cell count in essential thrombocythemia. Eur J Haematol. 2020; 106(1):58-63. PMC: 7756407. DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13516. View

4.
Godfrey A, Green A, Harrison C . Essential thrombocythemia: challenges in clinical practice and future prospects. Blood. 2022; 141(16):1943-1953. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022017625. View

5.
Mesa R, Jamieson C, Bhatia R, Deininger M, Fletcher C, Gerds A . NCCN Guidelines Insights: Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017; 15(10):1193-1207. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0157. View