» Articles » PMID: 37474736

Transfer Learning-based Attenuation Correction for Static and Dynamic Cardiac PET Using a Generative Adversarial Network

Overview
Date 2023 Jul 20
PMID 37474736
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility of directly generating attenuation-corrected PET images from non-attenuation-corrected (NAC) PET images for both rest and stress-state static or dynamic [N]ammonia MP PET based on a generative adversarial network.

Methods: We recruited 60 subjects for rest-only scans and 14 subjects for rest-stress scans, all of whom underwent [N]ammonia cardiac PET/CT examinations to acquire static and dynamic frames with both 3D NAC and CT-based AC (CTAC) PET images. We developed a 3D pix2pix deep learning AC (DLAC) framework via a U-net + ResNet-based generator and a convolutional neural network-based discriminator. Paired static or dynamic NAC and CTAC PET images from 60 rest-only subjects were used as network inputs and labels for static (S-DLAC) and dynamic (D-DLAC) training, respectively. The pre-trained S-DLAC network was then fine-tuned by paired dynamic NAC and CTAC PET frames of 60 rest-only subjects to derive an improved D-DLAC-FT for dynamic PET images. The 14 rest-stress subjects were used as an internal testing dataset and separately tested on different network models without training. The proposed methods were evaluated using visual quality and quantitative metrics.

Results: The proposed S-DLAC, D-DLAC, and D-DLAC-FT methods were consistent with clinical CTAC in terms of various images and quantitative metrics. The S-DLAC (slope = 0.9423, R = 0.947) showed a higher correlation with the reference static CTAC as compared to static NAC (slope = 0.0992, R = 0.654). D-DLAC-FT yielded lower myocardial blood flow (MBF) errors in the whole left ventricular myocardium than D-DLAC, but with no significant difference, both for the 60 rest-state subjects (6.63 ± 5.05% vs. 7.00 ± 6.84%, p = 0.7593) and the 14 stress-state subjects (1.97 ± 2.28% vs. 3.21 ± 3.89%, p = 0.8595).

Conclusion: The proposed S-DLAC, D-DLAC, and D-DLAC-FT methods achieve comparable performance with clinical CTAC. Transfer learning shows promising potential for dynamic MP PET.

Citing Articles

Conditional generative adversarial network-assisted system for radiation-free evaluation of scoliosis using a single smartphone photograph: a model development and validation study.

He Z, Lu N, Chen Y, Chui E, Liu Z, Qin X EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 75:102779.

PMID: 39252864 PMC: 11381623. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102779.


Artificial intelligence-based joint attenuation and scatter correction strategies for multi-tracer total-body PET.

Sun H, Huang Y, Hu D, Hong X, Salimi Y, Lv W EJNMMI Phys. 2024; 11(1):66.

PMID: 39028439 PMC: 11264498. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-024-00666-8.


In vitro and in vivo study on the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with radionuclide labeled PD-L1 nanobody.

Zhu M, Zhang J, Yang M, Zhang H, Xu T, Kan F J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(11):8429-8442.

PMID: 37085729 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04793-0.

References
1.
Kaufmann P, Camici P . Myocardial blood flow measurement by PET: technical aspects and clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2005; 46(1):75-88. View

2.
Di Carli M, Dorbala S, Meserve J, El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Moore S . Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(5):783-93. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.106.032789. View

3.
Schindler T, Schelbert H, Quercioli A, Dilsizian V . Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3(6):623-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.04.007. View

4.
Maddahi J, Packard R . Cardiac PET perfusion tracers: current status and future directions. Semin Nucl Med. 2014; 44(5):333-43. PMC: 4333146. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.06.011. View

5.
Souvatzoglou M, Bengel F, Busch R, Kruschke C, Fernolendt H, Lee D . Attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT with three different CT protocols: a comparison with conventional PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 34(12):1991-2000. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-007-0492-4. View