» Articles » PMID: 37469720

Age, Blood Tests and Comorbidities and AIMS65 Risk Scores Outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and Pre-endoscopic Rockall Score in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Abstract

Background: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a life-threatening condition with high mortality rates.

Aim: To compare the performance of pre-endoscopic risk scores in predicting the following primary outcomes: In-hospital mortality, intervention (endoscopic or surgical) and length of admission (≥ 7 d).

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 363 patients presenting with upper GI bleeding from December 2020 to January 2021. We calculated and compared the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs) of Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), pre-endoscopic Rockall score (PERS), albumin, international normalized ratio, altered mental status, systolic blood pressure, age older than 65 (AIMS65) and age, blood tests and comorbidities (ABC), including their optimal cut-off in variceal and non-variceal upper GI bleeding cohorts. We subsequently analyzed through a logistic binary regression model, if addition of lactate increased the score performance.

Results: All scores had discriminative ability in predicting in-hospital mortality irrespective of study group. AIMS65 score had the best performance in the variceal bleeding group (AUROC = 0.772; < 0.001), and ABC score (AUROC = 0.775; < 0.001) in the non-variceal bleeding group. However, ABC score, at a cut-off value of 5.5, was the best predictor (AUROC = 0.770, = 0.001) of in-hospital mortality in both populations. PERS score was a good predictor for endoscopic treatment (AUC = 0.604; = 0.046) in the variceal population, while GBS score, (AUROC = 0.722; = 0.024), outperformed the other scores in predicting surgical intervention. Addition of lactate to AIMS65 score, increases by 5-fold the probability of in-hospital mortality ( < 0.05) and by 12-fold if added to GBS score ( < 0.003). No score proved to be a good predictor for length of admission.

Conclusion: ABC score is the most accurate in predicting in-hospital mortality in both mixed and non-variceal bleeding population. PERS and GBS should be used to determine need for endoscopic and surgical intervention, respectively. Lactate can be used as an additional tool to risk scores for predicting in-hospital mortality.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Four Scoring Systems for Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Elsabani E, Badr B, Dhalaan M, AlOtaibi A, AlRujaib A, Alahmed R Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74684.

PMID: 39618729 PMC: 11608399. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74684.

References
1.
Yang L, Sun R, Wei N, Chen H . Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk scores in prediction for the clinical outcomes in patients with acute variceal bleeding. Ann Med. 2021; 53(1):1806-1815. PMC: 8525940. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1990394. View

2.
Saltzman J, Tabak Y, Hyett B, Sun X, Travis A, Johannes R . A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74(6):1215-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.024. View

3.
Wada T, Hagiwara A, Uemura T, Yahagi N, Kimura A . Early lactate clearance for predicting active bleeding in critically ill patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study. Intern Emerg Med. 2016; 11(5):737-43. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-016-1392-z. View

4.
Blatchford O, Murray W, Blatchford M . A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet. 2000; 356(9238):1318-21. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02816-6. View

5.
Gralnek I, Stanley A, Morris A, Camus M, Lau J, Lanas A . Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021. Endoscopy. 2021; 53(3):300-332. DOI: 10.1055/a-1369-5274. View