» Articles » PMID: 37469171

Interval Cancers in a National Colorectal Screening Programme Based on Faecal Immunochemical Testing: Implications for Faecal Haemoglobin Concentration Threshold and Sex Inequality

Overview
Journal J Med Screen
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Jul 20
PMID 37469171
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare interval cancer proportions (ICP) in the faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (SBoSP) with the former guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT)-based SBoSP and investigate associations between interval cancer (IC) and faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) threshold, sex, age, deprivation, site, and stage.

Methods: The ICP data from first year of the FIT-based SBoSP and the penultimate year of the gFOBT-based SBoSP were compared in a prospective cohort design.

Results: With FIT, 801 colorectal cancers (CRCs) were screen detected (SDC), 802 were in non-participants, 548 were ICs, 39 were colonoscopy missed and 72 were diagnosed after incomplete screening; with gFOBT: 540, 904, 556, 45, and 13, respectively. FIT had a significantly higher proportion of SDC compared to IC than gFOBT. For FIT and gFOBT, ICP was significantly higher in women than men. As f-Hb threshold increased, ICP increased and, for any f-Hb threshold for men, a lower threshold was required for comparable ICP in women. In Scotland, the current threshold of ≥80 µg Hb/g faeces would have to be lowered to ≥40 µg Hb/g faeces for women to achieve sex equality for ICP. In the FIT-based SBoSP, there were four times as many stage I SDC than IC. This was reversed in advanced stages, with twice as many stage IV CRC diagnosed as IC versus SDC.

Conclusions: Reducing the numbers of IC requires lowering the f-Hb threshold. Using different f-Hb thresholds for women and men could eliminate the sex disparity, but with additional colonoscopy.

References
1.
McDonald P, Strachan J, Digby J, Steele R, Fraser C . Faecal haemoglobin concentrations by gender and age: implications for population-based screening for colorectal cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011; 50(5):935-40. DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.815. View

2.
Steele R, McClements P, Libby G, Black R, Morton C, Birrell J . Results from the first three rounds of the Scottish demonstration pilot of FOBT screening for colorectal cancer. Gut. 2008; 58(4):530-5. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.162883. View

3.
Bretagne J, Carlo A, Piette C, Rousseau C, Cosson M, Lievre A . Significant decrease in interval colorectal cancer incidence after implementing immunochemical testing in a multiple-round guaiac-based screening programme. Br J Cancer. 2021; 125(11):1494-1502. PMC: 8608916. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01546-z. View

4.
Digby J, Fraser C, Carey F, Lang J, Stanners G, Steele R . Interval cancers using a quantitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for haemoglobin when colonoscopy capacity is limited. J Med Screen. 2015; 23(3):130-4. DOI: 10.1177/0969141315609634. View

5.
Ibanez-Sanz G, Mila N, Vives N, Vidal C, Binefa G, Rocamora J . Diagnostic Performance of a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program According to Ambient Temperature and Humidity. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(5). PMC: 8909312. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051153. View