» Articles » PMID: 37466970

A Hybrid Machine-learning Approach for Analysis of Methane Hydrate Formation Dynamics in Porous Media with Synchrotron CT Imaging

Overview
Date 2023 Jul 19
PMID 37466970
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fast multi-phase processes in methane hydrate bearing samples pose a challenge for quantitative micro-computed tomography study and experiment steering due to complex tomographic data analysis involving time-consuming segmentation procedures. This is because of the sample's multi-scale structure, which changes over time, low contrast between solid and fluid materials, and the large amount of data acquired during dynamic processes. Here, a hybrid approach is proposed for the automatic segmentation of tomographic data from time-resolved imaging of methane gas-hydrate formation in sandy granular media, which includes a deep-learning 3D U-Net model. To prepare a training dataset for the 3D U-Net, a technique to automate data labeling based on sample-specific information about the mineral matrix immobility and occasional fluid movement in pores is proposed. Automatic segmentation allowed for studying properties of the hydrate growth in pores, as well as dynamic processes such as incremental flow and redistribution of pore brine. Results of the quantitative analysis showed that for typical gas-hydrate stability parameters (100 bar methane pressure, 7°C temperature) the rate of formation is slow (less than 1% per hour), after which the surface area of contact between brine and gas increases, resulting in faster formation (2.5% per hour). Hydrate growth reaches the saturation point after 11 h of the experiment. Finally, the efficacy of the proposed segmentation scheme in on-the-fly automatic data analysis and experiment steering with zooming to regions of interest is demonstrated.

Citing Articles

A pore-scale study of fracture sealing through enzymatically-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) method demonstrates its potential for CO storage management.

Hemayati M, Aghaei H, Daman Shokouh A, Nikooee E, Niazi A, Khodadadi Tirkolaei H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17832.

PMID: 39090349 PMC: 11294598. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68720-0.

References
1.
Sinchuk Y, Kibleur P, Aelterman J, Boone M, Van Paepegem W . Variational and Deep Learning Segmentation of Very-low-contrast X-ray Computed Tomography Images of Carbon/Epoxy Woven Composites. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(4). PMC: 7079634. DOI: 10.3390/ma13040936. View

2.
Nikitin V . TomocuPy - efficient GPU-based tomographic reconstruction with asynchronous data processing. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2023; 30(Pt 1):179-191. PMC: 9814072. DOI: 10.1107/S1600577522010311. View

3.
Deniz C, Xiang S, Hallyburton R, Welbeck A, Babb J, Honig S . Segmentation of the Proximal Femur from MR Images using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):16485. PMC: 6220200. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34817-6. View

4.
Fusseis F, Steeb H, Xiao X, Zhu W, Butler I, Elphick S . A low-cost X-ray-transparent experimental cell for synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography studies under geological reservoir conditions. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2013; 21(Pt 1):251-3. DOI: 10.1107/S1600577513026969. View

5.
Falk T, Mai D, Bensch R, Cicek O, Abdulkadir A, Marrakchi Y . U-Net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry. Nat Methods. 2018; 16(1):67-70. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-018-0261-2. View