» Articles » PMID: 37465730

The Timing of Booster Sessions May Not Improve Resuscitation Skill Retention Among Healthcare Providers: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Can Med Educ J
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2023 Jul 19
PMID 37465730
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Booster sessions can improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill retention among healthcare providers; however, the optimal timing of these sessions is unknown. This study aimed to explore differences in skill retention based on booster session timing.

Methods: After ethics approval, healthcare providers who completed an initial CPR training course were randomly assigned to either an early booster, late booster, or no booster group. Participants' mean resuscitation scores, time to initiate compressions, and time to successfully provide defibrillation were assessed immediately post-course and four months later using linear mixed models.

Results: Seventy-three healthcare professionals were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences by randomization in the immediate post-test (9.7, 9.2, 8.9) or retention test (10.2, 9.8, and 9.5) resuscitation scores. No significant effects were observed for time to compression. Post-test time to defibrillation (mean ± SE: 112.8 ± 3.0 sec) was significantly faster compared to retention (mean ± SE: 120.4 ± 2.7 sec) ( = 0.04); however, the effect did not vary by randomization.

Conclusion: No difference was observed in resuscitation skill retention between the early, late, and no booster groups. More research is needed to determine the aspects of a booster session beyond timing that contribute to skill retention.

Citing Articles

The Tree of Life and other tragedies: a brief response.

DEon M Can Med Educ J. 2023; 14(3):1-5.

PMID: 37465731 PMC: 10351642. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.77688.

References
1.
Glerup Lauridsen K, Lofgren B, Brogaard L, Paltved C, Hvidman L, Krogh K . Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training for Healthcare Professionals: A Scoping Review. Simul Healthc. 2021; 17(3):170-182. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000608. View

2.
Li Q, Zhou R, Liu J, Lin J, Ma E, Liang P . Pre-training evaluation and feedback improved skills retention of basic life support in medical students. Resuscitation. 2013; 84(9):1274-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.017. View

3.
Kleinman M, Brennan E, Goldberger Z, Swor R, Terry M, Bobrow B . Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S414-35. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259. View

4.
Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D . CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2011; 9(8):672-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004. View

5.
Kardong-Edgren S, Oermann M, Jastrzembski T, Krusmark M, Gluck K, Molloy M . Baseline Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skill Performance of Nursing Students Is Improved After One Resuscitation Quality Improvement Skill Refresher. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2020; 36(2):57-62. DOI: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000614. View