» Articles » PMID: 37464932

Evolutionary Modifications of Larval Prey Capture (LPC) in a Dark Environment

Overview
Journal Zool Res
Publisher Science Press
Date 2023 Jul 19
PMID 37464932
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Feeding strategies of an organism depend on the multimodal sensory processing that most efficiently integrates available visual, chemosensory, and/or mechanoreceptive cues as part of their environmental adaptation. The blind cavefish morph of has developed sensory-dependent behaviors to find food more efficiently than their eyed, surface-morph counterparts while in darkness. In the absence of light, adult cavefish have evolved enhanced behaviors, such as vibration attraction behavior (VAB), and changes in feeding angle. Here, we identified evolved differences in cavefish larval prey capture (LPC) behavior. In the dark, LPC is more efficient in cavefish than in surface fish. Furthermore, different cave populations express laterality in their LPC and strike towards prey preferentially located on their left or right sides. This suggests the occurrence, to some extent, of divergent LPC evolution among cave populations. While LPC can be triggered exclusively by a vibration stimulus in both surface and cavefish, we provide evidence that LPC is, at least partially, a multimodal sensory process different from adult VAB. We also found that a lack of food may exacerbate the laterality of LPC. Thus, we proposed a mathematical model for explaining laterality based on a balance between: (1) enlarged range of foraging field (behavioral or perceptive) due to asymmetry, (2) food abundance, and (3) disadvantages caused by laterality (unequal lateral hydrodynamic resistance when swimming, allocation of resources for the brain and receptors, and predator escape).

Citing Articles

Wall-following - Phylogenetic context of an enhanced behaviour in stygomorphic (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) cavefishes.

Chen B, Dai W, Li X, Mao T, Liu Y, Pie M Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(6):e11575.

PMID: 38932953 PMC: 11199845. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11575.


Cavefish as biological models in the laboratory and in the wild.

Jeffery W, Ma L, Zhao Y Zool Res. 2023; 44(4):834-836.

PMID: 37464940 PMC: 10415760. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.186.

References
1.
Cavelius M, Brunel T, Didier A . Lessons from behavioral lateralization in olfaction. Brain Struct Funct. 2021; 227(2):685-696. PMC: 8843900. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-021-02390-w. View

2.
Kirchner S, Fedoruk M, Lohmuller T, Feldmann J . Analyzing the movement of the Nauplius 'Artemia salina' by optical tracking of plasmonic nanoparticles. J Vis Exp. 2014; (89). PMC: 4217367. DOI: 10.3791/51502. View

3.
Daghfous G, Green W, Zielinski B, Dubuc R . Chemosensory-induced motor behaviors in fish. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011; 22(2):223-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.009. View

4.
Catania K . Evolution of brains and behavior for optimal foraging: a tale of two predators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109 Suppl 1:10701-8. PMC: 3386870. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1201885109. View

5.
Espinasa L, Heintz C, Retaux S, Yoshisawa M, Agnes F, Ornelas-Garcia P . Vibration attraction response is a plastic trait in blind Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus), variable within subpopulations inhabiting the same cave. J Fish Biol. 2020; 98(1):304-316. DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14586. View