» Articles » PMID: 37462841

Operating an Overdose Prevention Site Within a Temporary Emergency Shelter During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Jul 18
PMID 37462841
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Setting: A temporary emergency shelter was established inside the Commonwealth Stadium in Edmonton, Alberta, to reduce COVID-19 transmission and mitigate health risks among people experiencing homelessness.

Intervention: A non-profit organization, Boyle Street Community Services, opened an overdose prevention site (OPS) between February and March 2022 inside the temporary emergency shelter. People accessed the shelter-based OPS to consume unregulated drugs (via injection, intranasally, or orally), receive medical aid, access sterile drug use equipment, and be connected to additional health and social supports, without leaving the shelter. We conducted short interviewer-administered surveys with OPS participants to examine participant views and identify suggested improvements.

Outcomes: The shelter-based OPS was accessed a total of 1346 times by 174 unique people. Fentanyl was the most common self-reported drug consumed (59%) and most consumption (99% of episodes) was by injection. OPS staff responded to 66 overdoses and reported no deaths. Survey respondents reported that the shelter-based OPS was convenient, with no need to forfeit their shelter spot or find transportation to another OPS. Respondents indicated that the OPS felt safe and accessible and reported that it reduced drug use in other shelter areas. Participants identified the OPS' exclusion of inhalation as a limitation.

Implications: People who use unregulated drugs and are experiencing homelessness are at a higher risk of negative health outcomes, which COVID-19 exacerbated. Integrating temporary shelter/housing and harm reduction services may be an innovative way to lower barriers, increase accessibility, and improve well-being for this structurally vulnerable population. Future operators should consider incorporating inhalation services to further reduce service gaps.

References
1.
Potier C, Laprevote V, Dubois-Arber F, Cottencin O, Rolland B . Supervised injection services: what has been demonstrated? A systematic literature review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 145:48-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.10.012. View

2.
Kennedy M, Karamouzian M, Kerr T . Public Health and Public Order Outcomes Associated with Supervised Drug Consumption Facilities: a Systematic Review. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2017; 14(5):161-183. DOI: 10.1007/s11904-017-0363-y. View

3.
Wallace B, Barber K, Pauly B . Sheltering risks: Implementation of harm reduction in homeless shelters during an overdose emergency. Int J Drug Policy. 2018; 53:83-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.12.011. View

4.
Wang Q, Kaelber D, Xu R, Volkow N . COVID-19 risk and outcomes in patients with substance use disorders: analyses from electronic health records in the United States. Mol Psychiatry. 2020; 26(1):30-39. PMC: 7488216. DOI: 10.1038/s41380-020-00880-7. View

5.
Taylor H, Leite A, Gautier D, Nunes P, Pires J, Curado A . Community perceptions surrounding Lisbon's first mobile drug consumption room. Dialogues Health. 2024; 1:100031. PMC: 10954018. DOI: 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100031. View