» Articles » PMID: 37461759

Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Management of Gastric Tube Cancers After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2023 Jul 18
PMID 37461759
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Esophagectomy is the proposed standard of care for resectable primary esophageal cancers and recurrent lesions in the reconstructed gastric tube (GT); however, it carries significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has established its role in the management of primary esophageal cancers with growing evidence of its safety in resecting recurrent primary lesions in GT. Our study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD in the management of recurrent, localized primary esophageal cancers in GT. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Scopus, and clinical trial registries from inception to March 2023 for articles evaluating the safety and efficacy of ESD in the management of recurrent cancerous lesions in GT. Our primary outcome was the en bloc resection rate. Secondary outcomes were curative resection rate, complete resection rate, intra-procedural complication rate, post-procedure complication rate, and five-year survival rate. Seven studies with a total of 165 patients undergoing 192 ESDs were included in the review. The pooled en bloc resection rate was 92.5% (95% CI: 87.7-95.6), which was reported in all seven studies. Pooled complete resection rate was 78.9% (95% CI: 64.5-88.5) per three studies, pooled curative resection rate was 73.9% (95% CI: 63.5-82.2) per four studies, and pooled intra-procedural complication rate was 10.2% (95% CI: 1.5-46.3), which was reported in four studies. Only three studies reported a five-year survival rate that was 65.5% (95% CI: 56.0-73.9). ESD is safe and efficacious in the management of GT cancer after esophagectomy.

References
1.
Mukasa M, Takedatsu H, Matsuo K, Sumie H, Yoshida H, Hinosaka A . Clinical characteristics and management of gastric tube cancer with endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(3):919-25. PMC: 4299345. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.919. View

2.
Merkow R, Bilimoria K, Keswani R, Chung J, Sherman K, Knab L . Treatment trends, risk of lymph node metastasis, and outcomes for localized esophageal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014; 106(7). DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju133. View

3.
Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Masao H, Okahara S, Tanuma T, Kodaira J . Endoscopic submucosal dissection is superior to conventional endoscopic resection as a curative treatment for early squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72(2):255-64, 264.e1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.040. View

4.
Sun F, Yuan P, Chen T, Hu J . Efficacy and complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 9:78. PMC: 4052291. DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-78. View

5.
Tachibana M, Hirahara N, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H . Clinicopathologic features of superficial esophageal cancer: results of consecutive 100 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 15(1):104-16. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9604-4. View