Functional Outcomes of Tibia Fractures Treated With Intramedullary Interlocking Nails by Suprapatellar Approach: A Prospective Study

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2023 Jul 18

PMID 37461755

Authors

Shree Sagar B V

Santosh S Nandi

Shreepad R Kulkarni

Rajkumar Bagewadi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background Tibia fractures are the most common lower extremity fractures. The subcutaneous anatomy of this long bone predisposes it to high fracture frequency in a high-energy trauma. The tibia is a major weight-bearing, long tubular bone that is axially and rotationally unstable when fractured, which ideally necessitates its surgical fixation in adults. Tibia fractures can be treated with a variety of choice of implants and surgical approaches. This study aims to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of a tibia fracture treated with intramedullary interlocking nails by a suprapatellar approach. Methodology A total of 32 patients were selected from patients admitted at Shri B. M. Patil Medical College and Research Centre with tibia fractures between January 2021 and May 2022. All the patients were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary interlocking nails by suprapatellar approach with a semi-extended knee position. All patients were followed up clinically and radiologically at regular intervals of six weeks, three months, six months, and one year. All functional outcomes were assessed based on modified Lysholm knee scores. Results A total of 31 patients showed union at the fracture site. One patient had nonunion and implant failure at the distal locking site, and two patients had persistent anterior knee pain at the end of one year. Functional outcome assessment based on modified Lysholm scores had excellent results, with a mean score of 95. Patients were followed up for a mean of 11.5 months. The mean time of union was observed as 12.5 months. Conclusions Suprapatellar tibia nailing is an effective alternative approach with ease of reduction and decreased intraoperative fluoroscopy time. The entry is in line with the medullary cavity preventing malreduction of proximal and distal tibia fractures. The additional proximal locking option also increases the stability of implant fixation.

Citing Articles

Impact of Surgical Timing on Fracture Healing in Tibial Shaft Injuries: A Comparative Review of Intramedullary Nailing Techniques.

Kashyap S, Ambade R, Landge S, Salwan A Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e70978.

PMID: 39507186 PMC: 11539009. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70978.

[Comparison of effectiveness of tibial intramedullary nailing fixation via suprapatellar approach and medial parapatellar approach in treatment of multiple tibial fractures].

Xu X, Zhao L, Fan W, Zhang X Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024; 38(6):728-733.

PMID: 38918195 PMC: 11190691. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202403038.

References

Sanders D, Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Heels-Ansdell D, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski M . Critical-sized defect in the tibia: is it critical? Results from the SPRINT trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(11):632-5. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000194. View

Freedman E, Johnson E . Radiographic analysis of tibial fracture malalignment following intramedullary nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (315):25-33. View

Serbest S, Tiftikci U, Coban M, Cirpar M, Daglar B . Knee Pain and Functional Scores After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures Using a Suprapatellar Approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 33(1):37-41. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001337. View

Cole J . Distal tibia fracture: Opinion: intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20(1):73-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000196658.55293.e6. View

Wolinsky P, Dennis D, Crist B, Curtiss S, Hazelwood S . The biomechanics of varied proximal locking screw configurations in a synthetic model of proximal third tibial fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2011; 25(3):175-9. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e47d0f. View

Franke J, Homeier A, Metz L, Wedel T, Alt V, Spat S . Infrapatellar vs. suprapatellar approach to obtain an optimal insertion angle for intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017; 44(6):927-938. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-017-0881-8. View

Larsen P, Elsoe R, Hansen S, Graven-Nielsen T, Laessoe U, Rasmussen S . Incidence and epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures. Injury. 2015; 46(4):746-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.027. View

Courtney P, Boniello A, Donegan D, Ahn J, Mehta S . Functional Knee Outcomes in Infrapatellar and Suprapatellar Tibial Nailing: Does Approach Matter?. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015; 44(12):E513-6. View

Buehler K, Green J, Woll T, Duwelius P . A technique for intramedullary nailing of proximal third tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1997; 11(3):218-23. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199704000-00014. View

10.

Court-Brown C, Caesar B . Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006; 37(8):691-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. View

11.

Fu B . Locked META intramedullary nailing fixation for tibial fractures via a suprapatellar approach. Indian J Orthop. 2016; 50(3):283-9. PMC: 4885297. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.181795. View

12.

Larsen P, Lund H, Laessoe U, Graven-Nielsen T, Rasmussen S . Restrictions in quality of life after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fracture: a retrospective follow-up study of 223 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2013; 28(9):507-12. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000031. View

13.

Jones M, Parry M, Whitehouse M, Mitchell S . Radiologic outcome and patient-reported function after intramedullary nailing: a comparison of the retropatellar and infrapatellar approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(5):256-62. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000070. View

14.

Tornetta 3rd P, Riina J, Geller J, Purban W . Intraarticular anatomic risks of tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 1999; 13(4):247-51. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199905000-00004. View

15.

Anandasivam N, Russo G, Swallow M, Basques B, Samuel A, Ondeck N . Tibial shaft fracture: A large-scale study defining the injured population and associated injuries. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017; 8(3):225-231. PMC: 5605888. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.07.012. View

16.

Cazzato G, Saccomanno M, Noia G, Masci G, Peruzzi M, Marinangeli M . Intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures in the semi-extended position using a suprapatellar approach: A retrospective case series. Injury. 2018; 49 Suppl 3:S61-S64. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.003. View

17.

Chan D, Serrano-Riera R, Griffing R, Steverson B, Infante A, Watson D . Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Tibial Nail Insertion: A Prospective Randomized Control Pilot Study. J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 30(3):130-4. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000499. View

18.

Sun Q, Nie X, Gong J, Wu J, Li R, Ge W . The outcome comparison of the suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing. Int Orthop. 2016; 40(12):2611-2617. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3187-2. View

19.

Gaines R, Rockwood J, Garland J, Ellingson C, DeMaio M . Comparison of insertional trauma between suprapatellar and infrapatellar portals for tibial nailing. Orthopedics. 2013; 36(9):e1155-8. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130821-17. View