» Articles » PMID: 37460621

Development of Optimal Sizing System for Tactical Gloves Applying Empirical Loss Coefficient Ratio

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Jul 17
PMID 37460621
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aims to improve Korean male soldiers' mission performance and protect them from safety accidents by establishing an optimal sizing system that considers the fit of tactical gloves and production and supply efficiency. First, the wearing condition of tactical gloves was investigated through in-depth interviews and surveys. The optimal glove fit and loss coefficient ratio was then analyzed through a glove size selection experiment. Finally, the sizing system was optimized and verified by comparing the coverage rate to the current sizing system. The empirically derived loss coefficient ratio was 0.075, and the optimal sizing system for tactical gloves was S-hand length: 168 mm, hand width: 81 mm, M-hand length: 177 mm, hand width: 83 mm, L-hand length: 184 mm, hand width: 86 mm, XL-hand length: 191 mm, and hand width: 89 mm. The coverage rate of the optimal sizing system proposed in this study was 86.4%, showing an improvement of approximately 21.1% compared to the current sizing system (65.3%). In conclusion, the optimal sizing system for tactical gloves proposed in this study can realistically solve current sizing issues, as it improved the coverage rate by 21.1% without incurring additional costs for production or hindering the supply efficiency.

References
1.
Kovacs K, Splittstoesser R, Maronitis A, Marras W . Grip force and muscle activity differences due to glove type. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002; 63(3):269-74. DOI: 10.1080/15428110208984713. View

2.
Hsiao H, Whitestone J, Kau T, Hildreth B . Firefighter Hand Anthropometry and Structural Glove Sizing: A New Perspective. Hum Factors. 2015; 57(8):1359-77. PMC: 4681492. DOI: 10.1177/0018720815594933. View

3.
Dias J, Garcia-Elias M . Hand injury costs. Injury. 2006; 37(11):1071-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.023. View

4.
Muralidhar A, Bishu R, Hallbeck M . The development and evaluation of an ergonomic glove. Appl Ergon. 2000; 30(6):555-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00005-8. View

5.
Kwon O, Jung K, You H, Kim H . Determination of key dimensions for a glove sizing system by analyzing the relationships between hand dimensions. Appl Ergon. 2008; 40(4):762-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.003. View