» Articles » PMID: 37460263

Is Personalised Prehabilitation Feasible to Implement for Patients Undergoing Oncological Treatment for Lung Cancer at a London Teaching Hospital? Protocol of a Feasibility Trial

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Jul 17
PMID 37460263
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: There is significant potential to improve outcomes for patients with lung cancer in terms of quality of life and survival. There is some evidence that prehabilitation can help, but, to date, this has only been tested in surgical populations, despite 70%-80% of patients with lung cancer in the UK receiving non-surgical treatment. The physiological and psychological benefits of prehabilitation seen in surgical patients could be extrapolated to those receiving non-surgical treatment, particularly in such a poor prognosis group. With patients and healthcare professionals, we have co-designed a personalised and evidence-based prehabilitation programme. This draws on a conceptual framework that aligns with patient values and needs as well as functional goals. We aim to investigate whether this programme is feasible to implement and evaluate in clinical practice.

Methods And Analysis: An open-label, single-group feasibility study incorporating quantitative assessments, a qualitative free text questionnaire and reflective field notes. Thirty participants will be recruited over an eight-month period from a single London teaching hospital. All recruited participants will receive a personalised prehabilitation programme during their oncological treatment. This includes a one-hour face-to-face appointment prior to, at week three and at week six of their treatment regimen as well as a weekly telephone call. Interventions including nutrition, physical activity and psychological well-being are stratified according to a patient's priorities, level of readiness and expressed needs. The primary outcome will be feasibility of the personalised prehabilitation programme in clinical practice by investigating areas of uncertainty regarding patient recruitment, attrition, treatment fidelity, intervention adherence and acceptability of study outcome measures. Secondary outcomes will include quality of life, functional capacity and grip strength.

Ethics And Dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Health Research Authority (reference number 22/PR/0390). Results of this study will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed articles, presentations at scientific conferences and in collaboration with patient and public involvement representatives.

Trial Registration Number: NCT05318807.

Citing Articles

'I was eager to do anything I could to improve the situation': a qualitative study of patients' experiences and views of prehabilitation for ovarian cancer surgery.

Saggu R, Shaw C, Hughes C, Lagergren P, Butler J, McGregor A BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):121.

PMID: 40089781 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03630-5.

References
1.
Hallingberg B, Turley R, Segrott J, Wight D, Craig P, Moore L . Exploratory studies to decide whether and how to proceed with full-scale evaluations of public health interventions: a systematic review of guidance. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018; 4:104. PMC: 5971430. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0290-8. View

2.
Goldsmith I, Chesterfield-Thomas G, Toghill H . Pre-treatment optimization with pulmonary rehabilitation in lung cancer: Making the inoperable patients operable. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 31:100663. PMC: 7846708. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100663. View

3.
Liu Z, Qiu T, Pei L, Zhang Y, Xu L, Cui Y . Two-Week Multimodal Prehabilitation Program Improves Perioperative Functional Capability in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2019; 131(3):840-849. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004342. View

4.
Sim J, Lewis M . The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 65(3):301-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.011. View

5.
Avery K, Williamson P, Gamble C, OConnell Francischetto E, Metcalfe C, Davidson P . Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(2):e013537. PMC: 5318608. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537. View