Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What Are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Introduction: To achieve quality in medical education, peer teaching, understood as students taking on roles as educators for peers, is frequently used as a teaching intervention. While the benefits of peer teaching for learners and faculty are described in detail in the literature, less attention is given to the learning outputs for the student-teachers. This systematic review focuses on the learning outputs for medical undergraduates acting as student-teachers in the last decade (2012-2022).
Aim: Our aim is to describe what learning outputs student-teachers have from peer teaching, and map what research methods are used to assess the outputs. We defined learning outputs in a broad sense, including all types of learning experiences, intended and non-intended, associated with being a peer teacher.
Methods: A literature search was conducted in four electronic databases. Title, abstract and full text were screened by 8 independent reviewers and selection was based on predefined eligibility criteria. We excluded papers not describing structured peer teaching interventions with student-teachers in a formalized role. From the included articles we extracted information about the learning outputs of being a student-teacher as medical undergraduate.
Results: From 668 potential titles, 100 were obtained as full-texts, and 45 selected after close examination, group deliberation, updated search and quality assessment using MERSQI score (average score 10/18). Most articles reported learning outputs using mixed methods (67%). Student-teachers reported an increase in subject-specific learning (62%), pedagogical knowledge and skills (49%), personal outputs (31%) and generic skills (38%). Most articles reported outputs using self-reported data (91%).
Conclusion: Although there are few studies that systematically investigate student-teachers learning outputs, evidence suggests that peer teaching offers learning outputs for the student-teachers and helps them become better physicians. Further research is needed to enhance learning outputs for student-teachers and systematically investigate student-teachers' learning outputs and its impact on student-teachers.
Oncu S, Torun F, Ulku H BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):278.
PMID: 39979969 PMC: 11843762. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-06877-6.
Feng H, Luo Z, Wu Z, Li X BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1467.
PMID: 39695653 PMC: 11653801. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06434-7.
Kamat S, Patel R, Patel R Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74540.
PMID: 39606130 PMC: 11599628. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74540.
Li P, Asri R, Holan G, Traba C, Chen S, Grachan J Anat Sci Educ. 2024; 18(1):59-67.
PMID: 39508135 PMC: 11669072. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2533.
The perceived long-term impact of peer teaching in the skills lab. A descriptive interview study.
Avonts M, Michels N, Vanderveken O, De Winter B, Bombeke K Med Educ Online. 2024; 29(1):2412394.
PMID: 39378047 PMC: 11463006. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2412394.