» Articles » PMID: 37455859

Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What Are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2023 Jul 17
PMID 37455859
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: To achieve quality in medical education, peer teaching, understood as students taking on roles as educators for peers, is frequently used as a teaching intervention. While the benefits of peer teaching for learners and faculty are described in detail in the literature, less attention is given to the learning outputs for the student-teachers. This systematic review focuses on the learning outputs for medical undergraduates acting as student-teachers in the last decade (2012-2022).

Aim: Our aim is to describe what learning outputs student-teachers have from peer teaching, and map what research methods are used to assess the outputs. We defined learning outputs in a broad sense, including all types of learning experiences, intended and non-intended, associated with being a peer teacher.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in four electronic databases. Title, abstract and full text were screened by 8 independent reviewers and selection was based on predefined eligibility criteria. We excluded papers not describing structured peer teaching interventions with student-teachers in a formalized role. From the included articles we extracted information about the learning outputs of being a student-teacher as medical undergraduate.

Results: From 668 potential titles, 100 were obtained as full-texts, and 45 selected after close examination, group deliberation, updated search and quality assessment using MERSQI score (average score 10/18). Most articles reported learning outputs using mixed methods (67%). Student-teachers reported an increase in subject-specific learning (62%), pedagogical knowledge and skills (49%), personal outputs (31%) and generic skills (38%). Most articles reported outputs using self-reported data (91%).

Conclusion: Although there are few studies that systematically investigate student-teachers learning outputs, evidence suggests that peer teaching offers learning outputs for the student-teachers and helps them become better physicians. Further research is needed to enhance learning outputs for student-teachers and systematically investigate student-teachers' learning outputs and its impact on student-teachers.

Citing Articles

AI-powered standardised patients: evaluating ChatGPT-4o's impact on clinical case management in intern physicians.

Oncu S, Torun F, Ulku H BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):278.

PMID: 39979969 PMC: 11843762. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-06877-6.


Effectiveness of Peer-Assisted Learning in health professional education: a scoping review of systematic reviews.

Feng H, Luo Z, Wu Z, Li X BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1467.

PMID: 39695653 PMC: 11653801. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06434-7.


Implementing and Evaluating Face-to-Face Near-Peer Teaching in Response to the Absence of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) for Junior Medical Students Following the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Kamat S, Patel R, Patel R Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74540.

PMID: 39606130 PMC: 11599628. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74540.


Effect of peer facilitation in anatomy small group curriculum on academic performance and retention: A pilot study.

Li P, Asri R, Holan G, Traba C, Chen S, Grachan J Anat Sci Educ. 2024; 18(1):59-67.

PMID: 39508135 PMC: 11669072. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2533.


The perceived long-term impact of peer teaching in the skills lab. A descriptive interview study.

Avonts M, Michels N, Vanderveken O, De Winter B, Bombeke K Med Educ Online. 2024; 29(1):2412394.

PMID: 39378047 PMC: 11463006. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2412394.


References
1.
Siddiqi H, Rehman R, Syed F, Martins R, Ibrahim M, Alam F . Peer-Assisted Learning (PAL): An innovation aimed at engaged learning for undergraduate medical students. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020; 70(11):1996-2000. DOI: 10.5455/JPMA.29714. View

2.
Kerr J . Confidence and humility: our challenge to develop both during residency. Can Fam Physician. 2007; 53(4):704-7. PMC: 1952607. View

3.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

4.
Nomura O, Onishi H, Kato H . Medical students can teach communication skills - a mixed methods study of cross-year peer tutoring. BMC Med Educ. 2017; 17(1):103. PMC: 5472895. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0939-7. View

5.
Rees E, Quinn P, Davies B, Fotheringham V . How does peer teaching compare to faculty teaching? A systematic review and meta-analysis (.). Med Teach. 2015; 38(8):829-37. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112888. View