» Articles » PMID: 37453083

Autonomic Reactivity During Acute Social Stress: Exploratory Investigation of an Interaction by Threat Interpretation Bias and Emotion Regulation Difficulties

Overview
Publisher Routledge
Date 2023 Jul 15
PMID 37453083
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: This preliminary study examined the interactive influences of interpretation bias and emotion dysregulation in predicting autonomic stress response.: Participants ( = 72 college students; ages 18-25, 70% female, 47% Hispanic/Latinx), completed a performance-based assessment of threat interpretation bias and self-report measures of emotion regulation difficulties. Electrodermal activity (EDA; skin conductance level) was collected while participants completed a standardized psychosocial stressor task.: Interpretation bias and emotion regulation difficulties interacted to predict EDA trajectories ( = 0.054, SE = .001, CI:.007, .002,  < .001) during acute stress: presence of interpretation bias toward threat ( = 6.950, SE = 2.826, CI: 1.407, 12.488,  = .013) emotion regulation difficulties ( = 9.387, SE = 3.685, CI: 2.141, 16.636,  = .011) was associated with greater reactivity and poorer recovery; presence of was associated with the lowest resting state EDA and blunted reactivity ( = 1.340, SE = 3.085, CI: -4.721, 7.407,  = .66).: Preliminary findings support interpretation bias and emotion regulation difficulties, and their distinct interactive patterns, as predictors of autonomic reactivity trajectories during stress. Interpretation bias modification and emotion regulation skills may be important intervention targets for common psychological conditions that are influenced by aberrant psychophysiological processes.

Citing Articles

Social Evaluation in Emerging Adults: Associations with Interpretation Bias and Perceived Social Support.

Jones E, Rozenman M Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024; .

PMID: 38329648 DOI: 10.1007/s10578-023-01663-1.


Cognitive bias modification for threat interpretations: Impact on anxiety symptoms and stress reactivity.

Rozenman M, Gonzalez A, Logan C, Goger P Depress Anxiety. 2020; 37(5):438-448.

PMID: 32301579 PMC: 7299169. DOI: 10.1002/da.23018.

References
1.
Latham M, Cook N, Simmons J, Byrne M, Kettle J, Schwartz O . Physiological correlates of emotional reactivity and regulation in early adolescents. Biol Psychol. 2017; 127:229-238. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.018. View

2.
Bernat E, Cadwallader M, Seo D, Vizueta N, Patrick C . Effects of instructed emotion regulation on valence, arousal, and attentional measures of affective processing. Dev Neuropsychol. 2011; 36(4):493-518. DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2010.549881. View

3.
Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S . Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009; 30(2):217-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004. View

4.
Hu M, Lamers F, de Geus E, Penninx B . Differential Autonomic Nervous System Reactivity in Depression and Anxiety During Stress Depending on Type of Stressor. Psychosom Med. 2016; 78(5):562-72. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000313. View

5.
Kudielka B, Buske-Kirschbaum A, Hellhammer D, Kirschbaum C . HPA axis responses to laboratory psychosocial stress in healthy elderly adults, younger adults, and children: impact of age and gender. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2003; 29(1):83-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4530(02)00146-4. View