» Articles » PMID: 37452974

Feasibility and Outcomes of Desarda Vs Lichtenstein Hernioplasty by Local Anesthesia for Inguinal Hernia: a Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Hernia
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Jul 15
PMID 37452974
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The Desarda autologous tissue repair is comparable to the Lichtenstein hernioplasty for inguinal hernia regarding recurrence, chronic groin pain, and return to work activities. This study was designed to establish the outcomes of Desarda's repair versus Lichtenstein's hernioplasty concerning post-operative recovery to normal gait and its feasibility under local anesthesia (LA).

Materials And Methods: This study was a single-center, prospective, double-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized trial. Patients undergoing open hernia repair for primary inguinal hernia were included. Patients were randomly assigned and followed up for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the time to return to normal gait post-surgery with comfort (non-inferiority margin fixed as 0.5 days). The secondary outcomes studied were post-operative pain score, the time required to return to work (all previously performed activities), and surgical-site occurrences (SSO).

Results: One hundred ten eligible patients were randomly assigned [56 patients (50.9%) in the Desarda group and 54 patients (49.1%) in the Lichtenstein group]. All the procedures were safely performed under LA. The median (interquartile range) time for resuming gait post-surgery with comfort was 5 days in the Desarda vs 4 days in Lichtenstein's arm (P = 0.16), thereby failing to demonstrate non-inferiority of Desarda against Lichtenstein hernioplasty. However, there were no significant differences in days to return to work, SSO, chronic groin pain, and recurrence within two years of surgery.

Conclusions And Relevance: This study could not demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Desarda repair versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty regarding the time taken to return to normal gait. Comparing the days to return to work, pain score, SSO, and chronic groin pain, including recurrence rate, Desarda repair faired equally with Lichtenstein hernioplasty, thereby highlighting its feasibility and efficacy under LA.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03512366.

References
1.
Szopinski J, Dabrowiecki S, Pierscinski S, Jackowski M, Jaworski M, Szuflet Z . Desarda versus Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia treatment: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg. 2012; 36(5):984-992. PMC: 3321139. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1508-1. View

2.
Falagas M, Kasiakou S . Mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005; 11(1):3-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01014.x. View

3.
Iakovlev V, Koch A, Petersen K, Morrison J, Grischkan D, Oprea V . A Pathology of Mesh and Time: Dysejaculation, Sexual Pain, and Orchialgia Resulting From Polypropylene Mesh Erosion Into the Spermatic Cord. Ann Surg. 2017; 267(3):569-575. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002134. View

4.
Fischer J . Hernia repair: why do we continue to perform mesh repair in the face of the human toll of inguinodynia?. Am J Surg. 2013; 206(4):619-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.03.010. View

5.
Desarda M . New method of inguinal hernia repair: a new solution. ANZ J Surg. 2001; 71(4):241-4. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02092.x. View