» Articles » PMID: 37449990

Better Post-operative Outcomes at 1-year Follow-up Are Associated with Lower Levels of Pre-operative Synovitis and Higher Levels of IL-6 and VEGFA in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Patients

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) is associated with inflammation, and residual inflammation may influence outcomes following knee arthroplasty. This may be more relevant for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) due to larger remaining areas of native tissue. This study aimed to: (1) characterise inflammatory profiles for medial UKA patients and (2) investigate whether inflammation markers are associated with post-operative outcomes.

Methods: This prospective, observational study has national ethics approval. Bloods, synovial fluid, tibial plateaus and synovium were collected from medial UKA patients in between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021. Cytokine and chemokine concentrations in serum and synovial fluid (SF) were measured with multiplexed assays. Disease severity of cartilage and synovium was assessed using validated histological scores. Post-operative outcomes were measured with Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) and pain scores.

Results: The study included 35 patients. SF VEGFA was negatively correlated with pre-operative pain at rest (r - 0.5, p = 0.007), and FJS-12 at six-week (r 0.44, p = 0.02), six-month (r 0.61, p < 0.01) and one-year follow-up (r 0.63, p = 0.03). Serum and SF IL-6 were positively correlated with OKS at early follow-up (serum 6 weeks, r 0.39, p = 0.03; 6 months, r 0.48, p < 0.01; SF 6 weeks, r 0.35, p = 0.04). At six weeks, increased synovitis was negatively correlated with improvements in pain at rest (r - 0.41, p = 0.03) and with mobilisation (r - 0.37, p = 0.047).

Conclusion: Lower levels of synovitis and higher levels of IL-6 and VEGFA were associated with better post-operative outcomes after UKA, which could be helpful for identifying UKA patients in clinical practice.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV case series.

Citing Articles

Robotic-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Provides Better FJS-12 Score and Lower Mid-Term Complication Rates Compared to Conventional Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Avram G, Tomescu H, Dennis C, Rusu V, Mengis N, Ammann E J Pers Med. 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 39728050 PMC: 11676095. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14121137.


Lateral meniscus extrusion on preoperative MRI and its impact upon mid-term clinical outcomes following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Fukai Y, Hiranaka T, Koide M, Fujishiro T, Okamoto K J Orthop. 2024; 65:15-19.

PMID: 39713556 PMC: 11656092. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.11.026.


Markers of Tissue Deterioration and Pain on Earth and in Space.

Patron M, Neset M, Mielkozorova M, Bisson D, Vigouroux M, Cata J J Pain Res. 2024; 17:1683-1692.

PMID: 38742243 PMC: 11089065. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S450180.

References
1.
Allen K, Thoma L, Golightly Y . Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021; 30(2):184-195. PMC: 10735233. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.04.020. View

2.
Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko M, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M . Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2009; 16(5):585-601. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x. View

3.
Beard D, Davies L, Cook J, MacLennan G, Price A, Kent S . The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019; 394(10200):746-756. PMC: 6727069. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31281-4. View

4.
Beekhuizen M, Gierman L, van Spil W, van Osch G, Huizinga T, Saris D . An explorative study comparing levels of soluble mediators in control and osteoarthritic synovial fluid. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013; 21(7):918-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.04.002. View

5.
Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger J, Kuster M . The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 27(3):430-436.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035. View