Elimination of a Postoperative Brace Does Not Increase Complications Following Hip Arthroscopy

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2023 Jul 14

PMID 37448381

Authors

Andrea H Johnson

Erica Richardson

Brook Fowler

Michaline West

Justin J Turcotte

Benjamin M Petre

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background The practice of routine postoperative bracing to limit abduction and internal rotation, along with weight-bearing restrictions after hip arthroscopy (HA), varies significantly among surgeons. It is unclear whether the use of a postoperative brace improves short-term outcomes in patients undergoing HA. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in patient outcomes before and after eliminating routine usage of a postoperative brace. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of 176 adult patients undergoing HA by a single, high-volume surgeon. The no-brace protocol was implemented in October 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: pre-implementation (January-October 2020) and post-implementation (October 2020-April 2021). Twenty-three patients that used a brace during the post-implementation period were excluded. All patients had weight-bearing restrictions with crutches for three weeks postoperatively. The primary endpoint was any complication in the first six weeks postoperatively. Results There were no significant differences in demographics between groups, although the body mass index in the brace group was higher (28.1 vs. 26.4 kg/m, p = 0.066) and the rate of additional procedures performed was higher in the brace group (55.2% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.056). There was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes between groups when looking at 90-day emergency department visits (1.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.548), complications at two (1.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 1.000) and six weeks (0% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.341) postoperatively, all complications in the first six weeks (1.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 1.000), and continued pain at six weeks (10.3% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.238). Conclusion The brace and no-brace groups were similar demographically. Patients undergoing HA with no brace and crutches experienced no significant differences in pain or complications in comparison to those receiving a traditional bracing protocol. Routine use of a postoperative brace may not be necessary in this population.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Across Different Surgeons, Surgical Techniques, and Postoperative Protocols: A Multi-institutional Study.

Spencer A, Newby N, Nosrat C, Wong S, Zhang A, Hagen M Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(1):23259671241303766.

PMID: 39850775 PMC: 11755493. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241303766.

References

Imam S, Khanduja V . Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop. 2011; 35(10):1427-35. PMC: 3174304. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1278-7. View

Parvizi J, Leunig M, Ganz R . Femoroacetabular impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007; 15(9):561-70. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200709000-00006. View

Griffiths E, Khanduja V . Hip arthroscopy: evolution, current practice and future developments. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(6):1115-21. PMC: 3353094. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1459-4. View

Newcomb N, Wrigley T, Hinman R, Kasza J, Spiers L, ODonnell J . Effects of a hip brace on biomechanics and pain in people with femoroacetabular impingement. J Sci Med Sport. 2017; 21(2):111-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.185. View

Khanduja V, Villar R . The arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007; 15(8):1035-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0319-7. View

Gupta A, Suarez-Ahedo C, Redmond J, Gerhardt M, Hanypsiak B, Stake C . Best Practices During Hip Arthroscopy: Aggregate Recommendations of High-Volume Surgeons. Arthroscopy. 2015; 31(9):1722-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.023. View

Bolia I, Briggs K, Matheny L, Philippon M . Survey results from an international hip course: comparison between experts and non-experts on hip arthroscopy clinical practice and post-operative rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 28(4):1270-1275. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5289-4. View

Philippon M, Stubbs A, Schenker M, Maxwell R, Ganz R, Leunig M . Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(9):1571-80. DOI: 10.1177/0363546507300258. View

Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock K . Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (417):112-20. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000096804.78689.c2. View

10.

Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R . Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(7):1012-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15203. View

11.

Bozic K, Chan V, Valone 3rd F, Feeley B, Vail T . Trends in hip arthroscopy utilization in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(8 Suppl):140-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.039. View

12.

Domb B, Sgroi T, VanDevender J . Physical Therapy Protocol After Hip Arthroscopy: Clinical Guidelines Supported by 2-Year Outcomes. Sports Health. 2016; 8(4):347-54. PMC: 4922519. DOI: 10.1177/1941738116647920. View

13.

Smith K, Gerrie B, McCulloch P, Lewis B, Mather R, Van Thiel G . Arthroscopic hip preservation surgery practice patterns: an international survey. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017; 4(1):18-29. PMC: 5467413. DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnw036. View

14.

Guyton G . Standards for Noninferiority Trials in Orthopaedic Surgery Would Be Arbitrary: It's Time We Had Some. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021; 103(17):e69. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01949. View

15.

Kremers H, Schilz S, Van Houten H, Herrin J, Koenig K, Bozic K . Trends in Utilization and Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in the United States Between 2005 and 2013. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 32(3):750-755. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.004. View