» Articles » PMID: 37447177

A 20-Country Comparative Assessment of the Effectiveness of Nutri-Score Vs. NutrInform Battery Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labels on Consumer Subjective Understanding and Liking

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2023 Jul 14
PMID 37447177
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The incidence of overweight and obesity has generated significant concerns among European consumers and institutions. As part of a set of measures undertaken, the European Union (EU) called for one harmonized mandatory front-of-pack nutritional label (FOPL) to improve consumer food nutritional knowledge and encourage healthier and more informed food choices. Different types of FOPLs, ranging from nutrient-specific labels-such as the NutrInform Battery-to summary labels-such as the Nutri-Score-have been developed and introduced in different markets, reporting different degrees of effectiveness in terms of understanding. The aim of this study is to provide actionable insights by analyzing a specific part of the complex consumers' decision-making process in food when aided by FOPLs. Adopting a between-subject experiment on a sample of 4560 respondents in 20 EU member countries, the study compares the consumer subjective understanding and liking of two labels currently under examination by the EU bodies, the NutrInform Battery and the Nutri-Score. At an aggregated level, the results show that NutrInform Battery is more effective than Nutri-Score in improving consumer subjective understanding and leads to a higher liking towards the label. A detailed by-country analysis highlights either a superiority or a parity of NutrInform Battery for subjective understanding and liking. Theoretically, this study, through a large panel of respondents, adds the fundamental perspective on subjective understanding, complementing the findings of extant research on objective understanding, and further clarifies the role of liking as a complementary element in the food decision-making process toward heathier and more informed food choices. This might be of significant relevance in providing additional evidence that can be used by policymakers in their attempt toward the selection of a uniform FOPL at EU level.

References
1.
Baccelloni A, Giambarresi A, Mazzu M . Effects on Consumers' Subjective Understanding and Liking of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels: A Study on Slovenian and Dutch Consumers. Foods. 2021; 10(12). PMC: 8700679. DOI: 10.3390/foods10122958. View

2.
Hamlin R, McNeill L, Moore V . The impact of front-of-pack nutrition labels on consumer product evaluation and choice: an experimental study. Public Health Nutr. 2014; 18(12):2126-34. PMC: 10271474. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980014002997. View

3.
Egnell M, Talati Z, Galan P, Andreeva V, Vandevijvere S, Gombaud M . Objective understanding of the Nutri-score front-of-pack label by European consumers and its effect on food choices: an online experimental study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020; 17(1):146. PMC: 7678195. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-01053-z. View

4.
Mejean C, Macouillard P, Peneau S, Hercberg S, Castetbon K . Consumer acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutrition labels. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013; 26(5):494-503. DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12039. View

5.
Neal B, Crino M, Dunford E, Gao A, Greenland R, Li N . Effects of Different Types of Front-of-Pack Labelling Information on the Healthiness of Food Purchases-A Randomised Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2017; 9(12). PMC: 5748735. DOI: 10.3390/nu9121284. View