» Articles » PMID: 37446929

Are There Prevalent Sex Differences in Psychostimulant Use Disorder? A Focus on the Potential Therapeutic Efficacy of Atypical Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors

Overview
Journal Molecules
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Jul 14
PMID 37446929
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Psychostimulant use disorders (PSUD) affect a growing number of men and women and exert sizable public health and economic burdens on our global society. Notably, there are some sex differences in the onset of dependence, relapse rates, and treatment success with PSUD observed in preclinical and clinical studies. The subtle sex differences observed in the behavioral aspects of PSUD may be associated with differences in the neurochemistry of the dopaminergic system between sexes. Preclinically, psychostimulants have been shown to increase synaptic dopamine (DA) levels and may downregulate the dopamine transporter (DAT). This effect is greatest in females during the high estradiol phase of the estrous cycle. Interestingly, women have been shown to be more likely to begin drug use at younger ages and report higher levels of desire to use cocaine than males. Even though there is currently no FDA-approved medication, modafinil, a DAT inhibitor approved for use in the treatment of narcolepsy and sleep disorders, has shown promise in the treatment of PSUD among specific populations of affected individuals. In this review, we highlight the therapeutic potential of modafinil and other atypical DAT inhibitors focusing on the lack of sex differences in the actions of these agents.

Citing Articles

Dual DAT and sigma receptor inhibitors attenuate cocaine effects on nucleus accumbens dopamine dynamics in rats.

Hersey M, Mereu M, Jones C, Bartole M, Chen A, Cao J Eur J Neurosci. 2024; 59(10):2436-2449.

PMID: 38444104 PMC: 11108740. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16293.


Potential therapeutics for effort-related motivational dysfunction: assessing novel atypical dopamine transport inhibitors.

Ecevitoglu A, Meka N, Rotolo R, Edelstein G, Srinath S, Beard K Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024; 49(8):1309-1317.

PMID: 38429498 PMC: 11224370. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-01826-1.


Organic cation transporters in psychiatric and substance use disorders.

Honan L, Fraser-Spears R, Daws L Pharmacol Ther. 2023; 253:108574.

PMID: 38072333 PMC: 11052553. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108574.

References
1.
Wee S, Woolverton W . Evaluation of the reinforcing effects of atomoxetine in monkeys: comparison to methylphenidate and desipramine. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004; 75(3):271-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.03.010. View

2.
Slack R, Ku T, Cao J, Giancola J, Bonifazi A, Loland C . Structure-Activity Relationships for a Series of (Bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl)sulfinyl Alkyl Alicyclic Amines at the Dopamine Transporter: Functionalizing the Terminal Nitrogen Affects Affinity, Selectivity, and Metabolic Stability. J Med Chem. 2019; 63(5):2343-2357. PMC: 9617638. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01188. View

3.
Newman A, Xi Z, Heidbreder C . Current Perspectives on Selective Dopamine D Receptor Antagonists/Partial Agonists as Pharmacotherapeutics for Opioid and Psychostimulant Use Disorders. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2022; 60:157-201. PMC: 9652482. DOI: 10.1007/7854_2022_347. View

4.
Sangroula D, Motiwala F, Wagle B, Shah V, Hagi K, Lippmann S . Modafinil Treatment of Cocaine Dependence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Subst Use Misuse. 2017; 52(10):1292-1306. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1276597. View

5.
Zhou W, Cunningham K, Thomas M . Estrogen regulation of gene expression in the brain: a possible mechanism altering the response to psychostimulants in female rats. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2002; 100(1-2):75-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-328x(02)00134-1. View