» Articles » PMID: 37446349

Opposite Auxin Dynamics Determine the Gametophytic and Embryogenic Fates of the Microspore

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Jul 14
PMID 37446349
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The microspore can follow two different developmental pathways. In vivo microspores follow the gametophytic program to produce pollen grains. In vitro, isolated microspores can be reprogrammed by stress treatments and follow the embryogenic program, producing doubled-haploid embryos. In the present study, we analyzed the dynamics and role of endogenous auxin in microspore development during these two different scenarios, in We analyzed auxin concentration, cellular accumulation, the expression of the auxin biosynthesis gene, and the efflux carrier gene, as well as the effects of inhibiting auxin biosynthesis by kynurenine on microspore embryogenesis. During the gametophytic pathway, auxin levels and and expression were high at early stages, in tetrads and tapetum, while they progressively decreased during gametogenesis in both pollen and tapetum cells. In contrast, in microspore embryogenesis, and genes were upregulated, and auxin concentration increased from the first embryogenic divisions. Kynurenine treatment decreased both embryogenesis induction and embryo production, indicating that auxin biosynthesis is required for microspore embryogenesis initiation and progression. The findings indicate that auxin exhibits two opposite profiles during these two microspore developmental pathways, which determine the different cell fates of the microspore.

Citing Articles

Recent Advances in Plant Somatic Embryogenesis: Where We Stand and Where to Go?.

Martinez M, Corredoira E Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(16).

PMID: 39201598 PMC: 11354837. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25168912.

References
1.
McSteen P . Auxin and monocot development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010; 2(3):a001479. PMC: 2829952. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001479. View

2.
Weijers D, Nemhauser J, Yang Z . Auxin: small molecule, big impact. J Exp Bot. 2018; 69(2):133-136. PMC: 5853209. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx463. View

3.
Uc-Chuc M, Perez-Hernandez C, Galaz-Avalos R, Brito-Argaez L, Aguilar-Hernandez V, Loyola-Vargas V . YUCCA-Mediated Biosynthesis of the Auxin IAA Is Required during the Somatic Embryogenic Induction Process in . Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(13). PMC: 7369726. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21134751. View

4.
Nowicka A, Juzon K, Krzewska M, Dziurka M, Dubas E, Kopec P . Chemically-induced DNA de-methylation alters the effectiveness of microspore embryogenesis in triticale. Plant Sci. 2019; 287:110189. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110189. View

5.
Wojcik A, Wojcikowska B, Gaj M . Current Perspectives on the Auxin-Mediated Genetic Network that Controls the Induction of Somatic Embryogenesis in Plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(4). PMC: 7072907. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041333. View