» Articles » PMID: 37445450

Multi-Site Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation Facilitates Upper Limb Sensory and Motor Recovery in Severe Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Study

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Jul 14
PMID 37445450
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) rank regaining arm and hand function as their top rehabilitation priority post-injury. Cervical spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) combined with activity-based recovery training (ABRT) is known to effectively facilitate upper extremity sensorimotor recovery in individuals with residual arm and hand function post SCI. However, scTS effectiveness in facilitating upper extremity recovery in individuals with severe SCI with minimal to no sensory and motor preservation below injury level remains largely unknown. We herein introduced a multimodal neuro-rehabilitative approach involving scTS targeting systematically identified various spinal segments combined with ABRT. We hypothesized that multi-site scTS combined with ABRT will effectively neuromodulate the spinal networks, resulting in improved integration of ascending and descending neural information required for sensory and motor recovery in individuals with severe cervical SCI. To test the hypothesis, a 53-year-old male (C2, AIS A, 8 years post-injury) received 60 ABRT sessions combined with continuous multi-site scTS. Post-training assessments revealed improved activation of previously paralyzed upper extremity muscles and sensory improvements over the dorsal and volar aspects of the hand. Most likely, altered spinal cord excitability and improved muscle activation and sensations resulted in observed sensorimotor recovery. However, despite promising neurophysiological evidence pertaining to motor re-activation, we did not observe visually appreciable functional recovery on obtained upper extremity motor assessments.

Citing Articles

Repeated epidural stimulation modulates cervical spinal cord excitability in healthy adult rats.

Sharma P, Rampersaud H, Shah P Exp Brain Res. 2024; 243(1):22.

PMID: 39665849 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06965-x.


Initial feasibility evaluation of the RISES system: An innovative and activity-based closed-loop framework for spinal cord injury rehabilitation and recovery.

Madarshahian S, Guerrero T, Aung P, Gustafson K, Harrop J, Johnson D J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2024; 11:20556683241280242.

PMID: 39421013 PMC: 11483808. DOI: 10.1177/20556683241280242.


Different Factors Influencing Postural Stability during Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Cervical Spinal Cord.

Bikchentaeva L, Nikulina M, Shulman A, Baltin M, Zheltukhina A, Semenova E J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(3).

PMID: 39311250 PMC: 11417861. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9030142.


Non-invasive spinal cord electrical stimulation for arm and hand function in chronic tetraplegia: a safety and efficacy trial.

Moritz C, Field-Fote E, Tefertiller C, van Nes I, Trumbower R, Kalsi-Ryan S Nat Med. 2024; 30(5):1276-1283.

PMID: 38769431 PMC: 11108781. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02940-9.


Characterizing neurological status in individuals with tetraplegia using transcutaneous spinal stimulation.

Oh J, Scheffler M, Martin C, Dinh J, Sheynin J, Steele A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):21522.

PMID: 38057398 PMC: 10700352. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48811-0.


References
1.
Anderson K . Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2005; 21(10):1371-83. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371. View

2.
Barss T, Parhizi B, Porter J, Mushahwar V . Neural Substrates of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation: Neuromodulation across Multiple Segments of the Spinal Cord. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(3). PMC: 8836636. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030639. View

3.
Katoh S, El Masry W . Neurological recovery after conservative treatment of cervical cord injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76(2):225-8. View

4.
Balbinot G, Li G, Kalsi-Ryan S, Abel R, Maier D, Kalke Y . Segmental motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury relates to density and integrity of corticospinal tract projections. Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):723. PMC: 9911610. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36390-7. View

5.
Lo C, Tran Y, Anderson K, Craig A, Middleton J . Functional Priorities in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury: Using Discrete Choice Experiments To Determine Preferences. J Neurotrauma. 2016; 33(21):1958-1968. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4423. View