» Articles » PMID: 37443693

Diagnostic Blood Biomarkers for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Jul 14
PMID 37443693
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(1) Background: The current diagnostic algorithm for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with the overuse of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). An additional highly specific blood test could potentially lower the proportion of patients with suspected PE that require CTPA. The aim was to summarize the literature on the diagnostic performance of biomarkers of patients admitted to an emergency department with suspected acute PE. (2) Methods: Medline and Embase databases were searched from 1995 to the present. The study selection process, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two reviewers. Eligibility criteria accepted all blood biomarkers except D-dimer, and CTPA was used as the reference standard. Qualitative data synthesis was performed. (3) Results: Of the 8448 identified records, only 6 were included. Eight blood biomarkers were identified, of which, three were investigated in two separate studies. Red distribution width and mean platelet volume were reported to have a specificity of ≥ 90% in one study, although these findings were not confirmed by other studies. The majority of the studies contained a high risk of selection bias. (4) Conclusions: The modest findings and the uncertain validity of the included studies suggest that none of the biomarkers identified in this systematic review have the potential to improve the current diagnostic algorithm for acute PE by reducing the overuse of CTPA.

Citing Articles

A new biomarker in the diagnosis and prognosis of pulmonary thromboembolism: Serum profilin-1.

Erdem E, Yadigaroglu M, Guzel M, Gulbuz L, Yilman M, Ocak M Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e37102.

PMID: 39286213 PMC: 11403089. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37102.


Life expectancy in cancer patients with pulmonary thromboembolism: From clinical prognostic biomarkers and paraclinical investigations to therapeutic approaches (Review).

Nemtut D, Petreanu C, Ulmeanu R, Rajnoveanu A, Rajnoveanu R Exp Ther Med. 2024; 28(3):354.

PMID: 39071911 PMC: 11273361. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2024.12643.

References
1.
Leeflang M . Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013; 20(2):105-13. DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12474. View

2.
Venkatesh A, Kline J, Courtney D, Camargo C, Plewa M, Nordenholz K . Evaluation of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department and consistency with a national quality measure: quantifying the opportunity for improvement. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172(13):1028-32. PMC: 3775003. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1804. View

3.
Konstantinides S, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing G, Harjola V . 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2019; 41(4):543-603. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405. View

4.
Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, Mallett S, Deeks J, Reitsma J . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(8):529-36. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. View

5.
Brenner D, Hall E . Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(22):2277-84. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. View