» Articles » PMID: 37443375

Intricacies of Relational Intimacy: Approaching the Invasive Edge with a Schizoid Patient

Overview
Journal Am J Psychoanal
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 Jul 14
PMID 37443375
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In hopes of contributing to the developing self-critique of relational analysis, I offer a case that illustrates a modified approach, one informed by current dialogue. The patient described had considerable unmet selfobject needs and a schizoid sensitivity to intrusion, engendering the question explored: How do two minds meet if one is largely relationally dissociated and acutely vulnerable when integrated? A premature emphasis on intersubjectivity would have obscured the patient's narcissistic needs and reinforced her tendency to retreat. Suspending the goal of intersubjectivity allowed for a regressive process to occur, and for contact to become safe before analyst and patient paved the way for future mutual relatedness.

References
1.
Doidge N . Diagnosing The English Patient: schizoid fantasies of being skinless and of being buried alive. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2001; 49(1):279-309. DOI: 10.1177/00030651010490010601. View

2.
Jacobs T . On countertransference enactments. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1986; 34(2):289-307. DOI: 10.1177/000306518603400203. View

3.
Kernberg O . The nature of interpretation: intersubjectivity and the third position. Am J Psychoanal. 1998; 57(4):297-312; discussion 313-6. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022463306053. View

4.
Kupermann D . Searching for a Sensitive Way of Working Through. Am J Psychoanal. 2017; 77(3):255-264. DOI: 10.1057/s11231-017-9101-x. View

5.
LAPLANCHE J . The theory of seduction and the problem of the other. Int J Psychoanal. 1997; 78 ( Pt 4):653-66. View