» Articles » PMID: 37442984

Frequency and Impact of Medication Reviews for People Aged 65 Years or Above in UK Primary Care: an Observational Study Using Electronic Health Records

Abstract

Background: Medication reviews in primary care provide an opportunity to review and discuss the safety and appropriateness of a person's medicines. However, there is limited evidence about access to and the impact of routine medication reviews for older adults in the general population, particularly in the UK. We aimed to quantify the proportion of people aged 65 years and over with a medication review recorded in 2019 and describe changes in the numbers and types of medicines prescribed following a review.

Methods: We used anonymised primary care electronic health records from the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD GOLD) to define a population of people aged 65 years or over in 2019. We counted people with a medication review record in 2019 and used Cox regression to estimate associations between demographic characteristics, diagnoses, and prescribed medicines and having a medication review. We used linear regression to compare the number of medicines prescribed as repeat prescriptions in the three months before and after a medication review. Specifically, we compared the 'prescription count' - the maximum number of different medicines with overlapping prescriptions people had in each period.

Results: Of 591,726 people prescribed one or more medicines at baseline, 305,526 (51.6%) had a recorded medication review in 2019. Living in a care home (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.40-1.62), medication review in the previous year (1.83, 1.69-1.98), and baseline prescription count (e.g. 5-9 vs 1 medicine 1.41, 1.37-1.46) were strongly associated with having a medication review in 2019. Overall, the prescription count tended to increase after a review (mean change 0.13 medicines, 95% CI 0.12-0.14).

Conclusions: Although medication reviews were commonly recorded for people aged 65 years or over, there was little change overall in the numbers and types of medicines prescribed following a review. This study did not examine whether the prescriptions were appropriate or other metrics, such as dose or medicine changes within the same class. However, by examining the impact of medication reviews before the introduction of structured medication review requirements in England in 2020, it provides a useful benchmark which these new reviews can be compared with.

Citing Articles

A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective structured medication reviews in primary care: Findings from the DynAIRx study.

Abuzour A, Wilson S, Woodall A, Mair F, Clegg A, Shantsila E PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0299770.

PMID: 39213435 PMC: 11364411. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299770.


The impact of COVID-19 on medication reviews in English primary care. An OpenSAFELY-TPP analysis of 20 million adult electronic health records.

Wood C, Speed V, Fisher L, Curtis H, Schaffer A, Walker A Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024; 90(7):1600-1614.

PMID: 38531661 PMC: 7616229. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.16030.

References
1.
Springate D, Kontopantelis E, Ashcroft D, Olier I, Parisi R, Chamapiwa E . ClinicalCodes: an online clinical codes repository to improve the validity and reproducibility of research using electronic medical records. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e99825. PMC: 4062485. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099825. View

2.
Midao L, Giardini A, Menditto E, Kardas P, Costa E . Polypharmacy prevalence among older adults based on the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018; 78:213-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.06.018. View

3.
Duncan P, Cabral C, McCahon D, Guthrie B, Ridd M . Efficiency versus thoroughness in medication review: a qualitative interview study in UK primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2019; 69(680):e190-e198. PMC: 6400610. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X701321. View

4.
Herrett E, Gallagher A, Bhaskaran K, Forbes H, Mathur R, van Staa T . Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Int J Epidemiol. 2015; 44(3):827-36. PMC: 4521131. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv098. View

5.
McCahon D, Duncan P, Payne R, Horwood J . Patient perceptions and experiences of medication review: qualitative study in general practice. BMC Prim Care. 2022; 23(1):293. PMC: 9682692. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01903-8. View