» Articles » PMID: 37442593

Somatostatin Receptor-PET/CT/MRI of Head and Neck Neuroendocrine Tumors

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Jul 13
PMID 37442593
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Due to its high sensitivity, somatostatin receptor-PET may detect smaller lesions and more extensive disease than contrast-enhanced MR imaging, while the superior spatial resolution of MR imaging enables lesions to be accurately localized. We compared results of somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI with those of MR imaging alone and assessed the added value of vertex-to-thigh imaging for head and neck neuroendocrine tumors.

Materials And Methods: Somatostatin receptor-PET/CT was acquired as limited brain or head and neck imaging, with optional vertex-to-thigh imaging, following administration of CU/GA DOTATATE. Somatostatin receptor-PET was fused with separately acquired contrast-enhanced MR imaging. DOTATATE activity was classified as comparable, more extensive, and/or showing additional lesions compared with MR imaging. Vertex-to-thigh findings were classified as positive or negative for metastatic disease or incidental.

Results: Thirty patients (with 13 meningiomas, 11 paragangliomas, 1 metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma, 1 middle ear neuroendocrine adenoma, 1 external auditory canal mass, 1 pituitary carcinoma, 1 olfactory neuroblastoma, 1 orbital mass) were imaged. Five had no evidence of somatostatin receptor-positive lesions and were excluded. In 11/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI and MR imaging were comparable. In 7/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI showed more extensive disease, while in 9/25, somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI identified additional lesions. On vertex-to-thigh imaging, 1 of 17 patients was positive for metastatic disease, 8 of 17 were negative, and 8 of 17 demonstrated incidental findings.

Conclusions: Somatostatin receptor-PET detected additional lesions and more extensive disease than contrast-enhanced MR imaging alone, while vertex-to-thigh imaging showed a low incidence of metastatic disease. Somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI enabled superior anatomic delineation of tumor burden, while any discrepancies were readily addressed. Somatostatin receptor-PET/MRI has the potential to play an important role in presurgical and radiation therapy planning of head and neck neuroendocrine tumors.

Citing Articles

The Value of PET/CT in Particle Therapy Planning of Various Tumors with SSTR2 Receptor Expression: Comparative Interobserver Study.

Lutgendorf-Caucig C, Wieland P, Hug E, Flechl B, Tubin S, Galalae R Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38791956 PMC: 11120397. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101877.

References
1.
Mayerhoefer M, Prosch H, Beer L, Tamandl D, Beyer T, Hoeller C . PET/MRI versus PET/CT in oncology: a prospective single-center study of 330 examinations focusing on implications for patient management and cost considerations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019; 47(1):51-60. PMC: 6885019. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04452-y. View

2.
Hintz E, Park D, Ma D, Viswanatha S, Rini J, Schulder M . Using 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET for Postoperative Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy Planning in Patients With Meningioma: A Case Series. Neurosurgery. 2023; 93(1):95-101. DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002377. View

3.
Ramirez C, Cheng S, Vargas G, Asa S, Ezzat S, Gonzalez B . Expression of Ki-67, PTTG1, FGFR4, and SSTR 2, 3, and 5 in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a high throughput TMA, immunohistochemical study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 97(5):1745-51. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-3163. View

4.
John M, Meyerhof W, Richter D, Waser B, Schaer J, Scherubl H . Positive somatostatin receptor scintigraphy correlates with the presence of somatostatin receptor subtype 2. Gut. 1996; 38(1):33-9. PMC: 1382976. DOI: 10.1136/gut.38.1.33. View

5.
Rostomily R, Elias M, Deng M, Elias P, Born D, Muballe D . Clinical utility of somatostatin receptor scintigraphic imaging (octreoscan) in esthesioneuroblastoma: a case study and survey of somatostatin receptor subtype expression. Head Neck. 2006; 28(4):305-12. DOI: 10.1002/hed.20356. View