» Articles » PMID: 37442583

Rectus Sheath Catheters Reduce Opiate Use in Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Pre- and Postintervention Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Can J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Jul 13
PMID 37442583
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the only curative option for patients with pancreatic cancer; however, pain remains a considerable problem postoperatively. With many centres moving away from using epidural analgesia, there is the need to evaluate alternative opiate sparing techniques for postoperative analgesia. We sought to determine if rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) had an opiate sparing and analgesic effect compared with standard care alone (opiate analgesia).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective pre- and postintervention cohort study of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a single tertiary academic hospital in Toronto, Canada, between April 2018 and December 2019. All patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy were eligible for inclusion. Among the 101 patients identified, 84 (61 control, 23 RSCs) were analyzed after exclusion criteria were applied (epidural analgesia, admission to intensive care intubated or reintubated within the first 96 hours). The pre-intervention group received a semi-standardized course of analgesics, including intravenous hydromorphone, acetaminophen, ketamine, with or without nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, and with or without intravenous lidocaine; the latter 2 drugs were at the individual anesthesiologist and surgeon's preference. For the postintervention group, the same course of analgesics were used, with the addition of RSCs. These were inserted at the end of the operation, with a loading dose of ropivacaine administered and followed by a programmed intermittent bolus regime for 72-96 hours. The primary outcome measure was total postoperative opiate consumption (oral morphine equivalents). Secondary outcomes included pain scores (numeric rating scale) and treatment-related adverse effects.

Results: Opiate consumption (oral morphine equivalents) at 96 hours was significantly lower (median 188 mg, interquartile range [IQR] 112-228 v. 242.4 mg, IQR 166.8-352) with and without RSC, respectively ( = 0.01). The RSC group used significantly less opiates at each time point from 24 hours postoperatively, with no significant difference in pain scores between the groups and no significant catheter-related complications.

Conclusion: The use of RSCs was associated with significant reductions in postoperative opiate consumption. Given the ease of placement and management, with minimal complications, RSCs should be incorporated into a course of postoperative multimodal analgesia. A large scale randomized controlled trial should be conducted to further investigate these findings.

References
1.
Tudor E, Yang W, Brown R, Mackey P . Rectus sheath catheters provide equivalent analgesia to epidurals following laparotomy for colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015; 97(7):530-3. PMC: 5210139. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2015.0018. View

2.
Levy N, Mills P . Controlled-release opioids cause harm and should be avoided in management of postoperative pain in opioid naïve patients. Br J Anaesth. 2019; 122(6):e86-e90. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.005. View

3.
Salicath J, Yeoh E, Bennett M . Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 8:CD010434. PMC: 6513588. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010434.pub2. View

4.
Laigaard J, Pedersen C, Ronsbo T, Mathiesen O, Karlsen A . Minimal clinically important differences in randomised clinical trials on pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2021; 126(5):1029-1037. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.021. View

5.
Brummett C, Waljee J, Goesling J, Moser S, Lin P, Englesbe M . New Persistent Opioid Use After Minor and Major Surgical Procedures in US Adults. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152(6):e170504. PMC: 7050825. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0504. View