» Articles » PMID: 37440841

Continuity of Care of Swiss Residents Aged 50+: a Longitudinal Study Using Claims Data

Overview
Date 2023 Jul 13
PMID 37440841
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Continuity of care (COC) should be measured for healthcare quality monitoring and evaluation and is a key process indicator for integrated care. Measurement of COC using routinely collected data is widespread, but there is no consensus on which indicator to use and the relevant time horizon to apply. Information about COC is especially warranted in highly fragmented healthcare systems, such as in Switzerland. Our study aimed to compare COC measures in Swiss residents aged 50+ obtained with various indices and time horizons.

Methods: Using insurance claims data, we computed and compared several commonly used visit-based Continuity of Care Indices (COCIs): Bice-Boxerman Index, Usual Provider of Care, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, Modified, Modified Continuity Index and Modified Continuity Index, based on all doctor visits and on primary care (PC) visits only. Indices were computed over short (1 year) and medium (4 years) terms.

Results: The mean indices based on all visits varied between 0.51 and 0.77, while PC indices presented less variation with a median of 1.00 for all but one index. Indices focusing on a variety of individual providers decreased with time horizon, while indices focusing on the overall number of visits and providers showed the opposite trend. These findings suggest fundamental differences in the interpretation of COCIs.

Conclusions: Broad COC appeared moderately low in Switzerland, although comparable to other countries, and PC COC was close to one. The choice of indices and time horizon influenced their interpretation. Understanding these differences is key to select the appropriate index for the monitoring of COC.

References
1.
Lin I, Wu S . Effects of long-term high continuity of care on avoidable hospitalizations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Health Policy. 2017; 121(9):1001-1007. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.010. View

2.
Meiqari L, Al-Oudat T, Essink D, Scheele F, Wright P . How have researchers defined and used the concept of 'continuity of care' for chronic conditions in the context of resource-constrained settings? A scoping review of existing literature and a proposed conceptual framework. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019; 17(1):27. PMC: 6407241. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0426-1. View

3.
Jee S, Cabana M . Indices for continuity of care: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2006; 63(2):158-88. DOI: 10.1177/1077558705285294. View

4.
Dreiher J, Comaneshter D, Rosenbluth Y, Battat E, Bitterman H, Cohen A . The association between continuity of care in the community and health outcomes: a population-based study. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012; 1(1):21. PMC: 3424831. DOI: 10.1186/2045-4015-1-21. View

5.
Kao Y, Tseng T, Ng Y, Wu S . Association between continuity of care and emergency department visits and hospitalization in senior adults with asthma-COPD overlap. Health Policy. 2018; 123(2):222-228. PMC: 7114593. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.11.005. View