» Articles » PMID: 37440162

Reading Text Aloud Benefits Memory but Not Comprehension

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Jul 13
PMID 37440162
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The production effect-that reading aloud leads to better memory than does reading silently-has been defined narrowly with reference to memory; it has been explored largely using word lists as the material to be read and remembered. But might the benefit of production extend beyond memory and beyond individual words? In a series of four experiments, passages from reading comprehension tests served as the study material. Participants read some passages aloud and others silently. After each passage, they completed multiple-choice questions about that passage. Separating the multiple-choice questions into memory-focused versus comprehension-focused questions, we observed a consistent production benefit only for the memory-focused questions. Production clearly improves memory for text, not just for individual words, and also extends to multiple-choice testing. The overall pattern of findings fits with the distinctiveness account of production-that information read aloud stands out at study and at test from information read silently. Only when the tested information is a very close match to the studied information, as is the case for memory questions but not for comprehension questions, does production improve accuracy.

References
1.
Brysbaert M, New B . Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):977-90. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977. View

2.
Brysbaert M, Warriner A, Kuperman V . Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behav Res Methods. 2013; 46(3):904-11. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5. View

3.
Brysbaert M, Mandera P, McCormick S, Keuleers E . Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas. Behav Res Methods. 2018; 51(2):467-479. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9. View

4.
Cooper E, Pantle A . The total-time hypothesis in verbal learning. Psychol Bull. 1967; 68(4):221-34. DOI: 10.1037/h0025052. View

5.
Cui L, Liu J . Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font. Vision (Basel). 2022; 6(3). PMC: 9501108. DOI: 10.3390/vision6030052. View