» Articles » PMID: 37440154

Data Sharing During Pandemics: Reciprocity, Solidarity, and Limits to Obligations

Overview
Journal J Bioeth Inq
Publisher Springer
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2023 Jul 13
PMID 37440154
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

South Africa shared with the world the warning of a new strain of SARS-CoV2, Omicron, in November 2021. As a result, many high-income countries (HICs) instituted complete travel bans on persons leaving South Africa and other neighbouring countries. These bans were unnecessary from a scientific standpoint, and they ran counter to the International Health Regulations. In short, South Africa was penalized for sharing data. Data sharing during pandemics is commonly justified by appeals to solidarity. In this paper, we argue that solidarity is, at best, an aspirational ideal to work toward but that it cannot ground an obligation to share data. Instead, low-and-middle income countries (LIMCs) should be guided by the principle of reciprocity, which states that we ought to return good for good received. Reciprocity is necessarily a conditional principle. LMICs, we argue, should only share data during future pandemics on the condition that HICs provide enforceable assurances that the benefits of data sharing will be equitably distributed and that LMICs won't be penalized for sharing information.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence for modelling infectious disease epidemics.

Kraemer M, Tsui J, Chang S, Lytras S, Khurana M, Vanderslott S Nature. 2025; 638(8051):623-635.

PMID: 39972226 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08564-w.


Health security-Why is 'public health' not enough?.

Akhavein D, Sheel M, Abimbola S Glob Health Res Policy. 2025; 10(1):1.

PMID: 39754216 PMC: 11697965. DOI: 10.1186/s41256-024-00394-7.


Stewardship and social justice: implications of using the precautionary principle to justify burdensome antimicrobial stewardship measures.

Johnson T Monash Bioeth Rev. 2024; 42(Suppl 1):1-15.

PMID: 39633161 PMC: 11850398. DOI: 10.1007/s40592-024-00224-z.


For the Good of the Globe: Moral Reasons for States to Mitigate Global Catastrophic Biological Risks.

Johnson T J Bioeth Inq. 2024; 21(3):559-570.

PMID: 38329644 PMC: 11652646. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10337-z.

References
1.
Silva D, Dawson A, Upshur R . Reciprocity and Ethical Tuberculosis Treatment and Control. J Bioeth Inq. 2016; 13(1):75-86. PMC: 4823342. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-015-9691-z. View

2.
McLennan S, Celi L, Buyx A . COVID-19: Putting the General Data Protection Regulation to the Test. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020; 6(2):e19279. PMC: 7265798. DOI: 10.2196/19279. View

3.
Pratt B, Bull S . Equitable data sharing in epidemics and pandemics. BMC Med Ethics. 2021; 22(1):136. PMC: 8493940. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00701-8. View

4.
Jackson C, Habibi R, Forman L, Silva D, Smith M . Between rules and resistance: moving public health emergency responses beyond fear, racism and greed. BMJ Glob Health. 2023; 7(12). PMC: 9723907. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009945. View

5.
Upshur R . Principles for the justification of public health intervention. Can J Public Health. 2002; 93(2):101-3. PMC: 6979585. View