» Articles » PMID: 37439847

Sex Differences in Glucose Homeostasis

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2023 Jul 13
PMID 37439847
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sexual dimorphism has been demonstrated to have an effect on various physiological functions. In this regard, researchers have investigated its impact on glucose homeostasis in both preclinical and clinical studies. Sex differences mainly arise from physiological factors such as sex hormones, body fat and muscle distribution, and sex chromosomes. The sexual dimorphism has also been studied in the context of diabetes. Reflecting the prevalence of the disease among the population, studies focusing on the sex difference in type 1 diabetes (T1D) are not common as the ones in type 2 diabetes (T2D). T1D is reported as the only major specific autoimmune disease that exhibits a male predominance. Clinical studies have demonstrated that impaired fasting glucose is more frequent in men whereas women more commonly exhibit impaired glucose tolerance. Understanding the sex difference in glucose homeostasis becomes more attractive when focusing on the findings that highlight sexual dimorphism on the efficacy or adverse effect profile of antidiabetic medications. Thus, in this chapter, we aimed to discuss the impact of sex on the glucose homeostasis both in health and in diabetes.

Citing Articles

Female mice exhibit resistance to disease progression despite early pathology in a transgenic mouse model inoculated with alpha-synuclein fibrils.

Tullo S, Park J, Gallino D, Park M, Mar K, Novikov V Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):288.

PMID: 39987244 PMC: 11846974. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07680-1.


The mediatory role of androgens on sex differences in glucose homeostasis and incidence of type 2 diabetes: the KORA study.

Raeisi-Dehkordi H, Thorand B, Beigrezaei S, Peters A, Rathman W, Adamski J Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024; 23(1):411.

PMID: 39548547 PMC: 11568628. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-024-02494-7.


Beyond reproduction: unraveling the impact of sex hormones on cardiometabolic health.

Xega V, Liu J Med Rev (2021). 2024; 4(4):284-300.

PMID: 39135604 PMC: 11317208. DOI: 10.1515/mr-2024-0012.

References
1.
Al-Beltagi M, Bediwy A, Saeed N . Insulin-resistance in paediatric age: Its magnitude and implications. World J Diabetes. 2022; 13(4):282-307. PMC: 9052009. DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i4.282. View

2.
Allard C, Morford J, Xu B, Salwen B, Xu W, Desmoulins L . Loss of Nuclear and Membrane Estrogen Receptor-α Differentially Impairs Insulin Secretion and Action in Male and Female Mice. Diabetes. 2018; 68(3):490-501. PMC: 6385757. DOI: 10.2337/db18-0293. View

3.
Amengual-Cladera E, Llado I, Gianotti M, Proenza A . Sex differences in the effect of high-fat diet feeding on rat white adipose tissue mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity. Metabolism. 2012; 61(8):1108-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2011.12.016. View

4.
Andersson B, Marin P, Lissner L, Vermeulen A, Bjorntorp P . Testosterone concentrations in women and men with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1994; 17(5):405-11. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.17.5.405. View

5.
Anichini R, Cosimi S, Di Carlo A, Orsini P, De Bellis A, Seghieri G . Gender difference in response predictors after 1-year exenatide therapy twice daily in type 2 diabetic patients: a real world experience. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013; 6:123-9. PMC: 3626369. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S42729. View