» Articles » PMID: 37439080

Population-level Impact of Expanding PrEP Coverage by Offering Long-acting Injectable PrEP to MSM in Three High-resource Settings: a Model Comparison Analysis

Abstract

Introduction: Long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) demonstrated superiority to daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the HPTN 083/084 trials. We compared the potential impact of expanding PrEP coverage by offering CAB-LA to men who have sex with men (MSM) in Atlanta (US), Montreal (Canada) and the Netherlands, settings with different HIV epidemics.

Methods: Three risk-stratified HIV transmission models were independently parameterized and calibrated to local data. In Atlanta, Montreal and the Netherlands, the models, respectively, estimated mean TDF/FTC coverage starting at 29%, 7% and 4% in 2022, and projected HIV incidence per 100 person-years (PY), respectively, decreasing from 2.06 to 1.62, 0.08 to 0.03 and 0.07 to 0.001 by 2042. Expansion of PrEP coverage was simulated by recruiting new CAB-LA users and by switching different proportions of TDF/FTC users to CAB-LA. Population effectiveness and efficiency of PrEP expansions were evaluated over 20 years in comparison to baseline scenarios with TDF/FTC only.

Results: Increasing PrEP coverage by 11 percentage points (pp) from 29% to 40% by 2032 was expected to avert a median 36% of new HIV acquisitions in Atlanta. Substantially larger increases (by 33 or 26 pp) in PrEP coverage (to 40% or 30%) were needed to achieve comparable reductions in Montreal and the Netherlands, respectively. A median 17 additional PYs on PrEP were needed to prevent one acquisition in Atlanta with 40% PrEP coverage, compared to 1000+ in Montreal and 4000+ in the Netherlands. Reaching 50% PrEP coverage by 2032 by recruiting CAB-LA users among PrEP-eligible MSM could avert >45% of new HIV acquisitions in all settings. Achieving targeted coverage 5 years earlier increased the impact by 5-10 pp. In the Atlanta model, PrEP expansions achieving 40% and 50% coverage reduced differences in PrEP access between PrEP-indicated White and Black MSM from 23 to 9 pp and 4 pp, respectively.

Conclusions: Achieving high PrEP coverage by offering CAB-LA can impact the HIV epidemic substantially if rolled out without delays. These PrEP expansions may be efficient in settings with high HIV incidence (like Atlanta) but not in settings with low HIV incidence (like Montreal and the Netherlands).

Citing Articles

Preference for Long-Acting Injectable PrEP Compared With Daily Oral PrEP Among Transgender Women in the U.S.: Findings From a Multisite Cohort.

Cooney E, Reisner S, Poteat T, Radix A, Mayer K, Beyrer C AJPM Focus. 2025; 4(2):100313.

PMID: 40051448 PMC: 11880704. DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100313.


Early Implementation of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir for HIV Prevention in a Safety Net Hospital-based Primary Care Center in U.S. South.

Baker D, Collins L, Cantos V, Hollenberg E, Kaplan A, Cowan T J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39934566 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09350-8.


Achieving the state of Georgia 25% HIV incidence reduction target among men who have sex with men in Atlanta through expanded use of multimodal pre-exposure prophylaxis: A mathematical model.

Fraysse J, Anderson S, Smith J, Matthews D, Sarkar S, de Aragao F PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0312369.

PMID: 39787101 PMC: 11717278. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312369.


Long-acting preexposure prophylaxis: early data on roll-out in the United States.

Koss C, Parikh U Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2024; 20(1):25-31.

PMID: 39633537 PMC: 11735044. DOI: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000894.


Population-level effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among men who have sex with men in Montréal (Canada): a modelling study of surveillance and survey data.

Doyle C, Milwid R, Cox J, Xia Y, Lambert G, Tremblay C J Int AIDS Soc. 2023; 26(12):e26194.

PMID: 38054579 PMC: 10699110. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26194.


References
1.
Maloney K, Le Guillou A, Driggers R, Sarkar S, Anderson E, Malik A . Projected Impact of Concurrently Available Long-Acting Injectable and Daily-Oral Human Immunodeficiency Virus Preexposure Prophylaxis: A Mathematical Model. J Infect Dis. 2020; 223(1):72-82. PMC: 7781468. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa552. View

2.
Grant R, Lama J, Anderson P, McMahan V, Liu A, Vargas L . Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(27):2587-99. PMC: 3079639. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011205. View

3.
Tan D, Hull M, Yoong D, Tremblay C, OByrne P, Thomas R . Canadian guideline on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis. CMAJ. 2017; 189(47):E1448-E1458. PMC: 5703677. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170494. View

4.
Hamilton D, Goodreau S, Jenness S, Sullivan P, Wang L, Dunville R . Potential Impact of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Black and White Adolescent Sexual Minority Males. Am J Public Health. 2018; 108(S4):S284-S291. PMC: 6215365. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304471. View

5.
Landovitz R, Donnell D, Clement M, Hanscom B, Cottle L, Coelho L . Cabotegravir for HIV Prevention in Cisgender Men and Transgender Women. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(7):595-608. PMC: 8448593. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2101016. View