» Articles » PMID: 37436604

Postoperative Outcomes and Quality of Life After Left Thoracoabdominal Esophagogastrectomy: Contrasting Esophagogastrostomy with Esophagojejunostomy

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Jul 12
PMID 37436604
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Following left thoracoabdominal (LTA) esophagogastrectomy, gastrointestinal continuity can be re-established via esophagogastrostomy or esophagojejunostomy. We explored how the method of reconstruction impacted postoperative outcomes and quality of life (QoL).

Methods: From January 2007 to January 2022, patients undergoing LTA were identified from a single center's prospectively maintained database. Following esophagogastrectomy or extended total gastrectomy, an esophagogastrostomy (GAS) or Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy (R-Y) was fashioned. Postoperative outcomes were compared according to the method of reconstruction. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophagus (FACT-E) questionnaire compared QoL.

Results: Of the 147 LTA patients identified, 135 (92%) were included-97 GAS (72%) and 38 R-Y patients (28%). R-Y patients had more ypT3/4 lesions (97% vs. 61%, p ≤ 0.001) and a similar incidence of ypN+/M+ disease. Anastomotic leaks were more common among GAS patients (17% vs. 3%, p = 0.023), however grade 3/4 complications (26.6% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.498), reoperation, intensive care admission, hospital representation and readmission were similar. FACT-E data were available for 68/97 (70%) GAS patients and 22/38 (58%) R-Y patients, with scores for 80/21/24/18/23/24 patients at baseline/preoperatively/1 month/3-6 months/1-3 years/3+ years postoperatively, respectively. Comparing between the groups, the scores were similar at each timepoint. FACT-E improved between baseline and preoperatively (79, 34-124 vs. 102, 81-123, p = 0.027). Only at 3+ years were postoperative scores equivalent to preoperative values. GAS patients had more reflux and esophagitis >6 months postoperatively (54% vs. 13%, p = 0.048; 62% vs. 0%, p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion: While the type of reconstruction did not affect QoL, it did affect the postoperative course.

References
1.
Portale G, Hagen J, Peters J, Chan L, DeMeester S, Gandamihardja T . Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 202(4):588-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.12.022. View

2.
Spicer J, Shewale J, Antonoff M, Correa A, Hofstetter W, Rice D . The Influence of Reconstructive Technique on Perioperative Pulmonary and Infectious Outcomes Following Chest Wall Resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102(5):1653-1659. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.072. View

4.
Straatman J, Joosten P, Terwee C, Cuesta M, Jansma E, van der Peet D . Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2015; 29(7):760-772. DOI: 10.1111/dote.12405. View

5.
Yuan D, Liu F, Wei Y, Li B, Yan L, Wen T . Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure in China. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 18(48):7234-41. PMC: 3544025. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7234. View

6.
Fagevik Olsen M, Grell M, Linde L, Lundell L . Procedure-related chronic pain after thoracoabdominal resection of the esophagus. Physiother Theory Pract. 2009; 25(7):489-94. DOI: 10.3109/09593980902813432. View