» Articles » PMID: 37436477

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation and Sustainment of Guideline-recommended Depression Screening for Patients with Breast Cancer in Medical Oncology: a Qualitative Study

Overview
Specialties Critical Care
Oncology
Date 2023 Jul 12
PMID 37436477
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Implementation of guideline-recommended depression screening in oncology presents numerous challenges. Implementation strategies that are responsive to local context may be critical elements of adoption and sustainment. We evaluated barriers and facilitators to implementation of a depression screening program for breast cancer patients in a community medical oncology setting as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we employed qualitative methods to evaluate clinician, administrator, and patient perceptions of the program using semi-structured interviews. We used a team-coding approach for the data; thematic development focused on barriers and facilitators to implementation using a grounded theory approach. The codebook was refined through open discussions of subjectivity and unintentional bias, coding, and memo applications (including emergent coding), and the hierarchical structure and relationships of themes.

Results: We conducted 20 interviews with 11 clinicians/administrators and 9 patients. Five major themes emerged: (1) gradual acceptance and support of the intervention and workflow; (2) compatibility with system and personal norms and goals; (3) reinforcement of the value of and need for adaptability; (4) self-efficacy within the nursing team; and (5) importance of identifying accountable front-line staff beyond leadership "champions."

Conclusions: Findings suggest a high degree of acceptability and feasibility due to the selection of appropriate implementation strategies, alignment of norms and goals, and a high degree of workflow adaptability. These findings will be uniquely helpful in generating actionable, real-world knowledge to inform the design, implementation, and sustainment of guideline-recommended depression screening programs in oncology.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02941614.

Citing Articles

Risk factors and prediction model for sub-threshold depression in young and middle-aged breast cancer patients.

Li J, Wang Y, Guo J, Jin L Am J Transl Res. 2025; 16(12):7542-7552.

PMID: 39822554 PMC: 11733342. DOI: 10.62347/BIYK4324.


Psychosocial support among adults living with metastatic breast cancer: Perspectives from providers across four New York-Presbyterian hospitals.

Zeng C, Matias-Gomez L, Kelly M, Hershman D, Rosenberg S, Pinheiro L Psychooncology. 2024; 33(1):e6296.

PMID: 38282222 PMC: 11213280. DOI: 10.1002/pon.6296.

References
1.
Dudgeon D, King S, Howell D, Green E, Gilbert J, Hughes E . Cancer Care Ontario's experience with implementation of routine physical and psychological symptom distress screening. Psychooncology. 2011; 21(4):357-64. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1918. View

2.
Suppli N, Johansen C, Christensen J, Kessing L, Kroman N, Dalton S . Increased risk for depression after breast cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study of associated factors in Denmark, 1998-2011. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(34):3831-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.0419. View

3.
Pilevarzadeh M, Amirshahi M, Afsargharehbagh R, Rafiemanesh H, Hashemi S, Balouchi A . Global prevalence of depression among breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 176(3):519-533. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05271-3. View

4.
Stanton A . Psychosocial concerns and interventions for cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(32):5132-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8775. View

5.
Riba M, Donovan K, Andersen B, Braun I, Breitbart W, Brewer B . Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019; 17(10):1229-1249. PMC: 6907687. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0048. View