» Articles » PMID: 37435602

Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Successful Coronary Angiography Through Right Radial Artery Access

Overview
Journal Interv Cardiol
Date 2023 Jul 12
PMID 37435602
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: One of the limitations of the right radial access approach is complex vessel anatomy, such as subclavian tortuosity. Several clinical predictors have been proposed for tortuosities, such as older age, female sex and hypertension. In this study, we hypothesised that chest radiography would add predictive value to the traditional predictors. : This prospective blinded study included patients who underwent transradial access coronary angiography. They were classified into four groups according to difficulty: Group I, Group II, Group III and Group IV. Different groups were compared according to clinical and radiographic characteristics. : The study included 108 patients (54, 27, 17 and 10 patients in Groups I, II, III and IV, respectively). The rate of crossover to transfemoral access was 9.26%. Age, hypertension and female sex were associated with a greater difficulty and failure rates. Regarding radiographic parameters, a higher failure rate was associated with a higher diameter of the aortic knuckle (Group IV, 4.09 ± 1.32 cm versus Groups I, II and III combined, 3.26 ± 0.98 cm; p=0.015) and the width of the mediastinum (Group IV, 8.96 ± 2.88 cm versus Groups I, II and III combined, 7.28 ± 1.78 cm; p=0.009). The cut-off value for prominent aortic knuckle was 3.55 cm (sensitivity 70% and specificity 67.35%) and the width of mediastinum was 6.59 cm (sensitivity 90% and specificity 42.86%). : Radiographic prominent aortic knuckle and wide mediastinum are valuable clinical parameters and useful predictors for transradial access failure caused by tortuosity of the right subclavian/brachiocephalic arteries or aorta.

References
1.
Christensen E, Landay M, Dietz G, Brinley G . Buckling of the innominate artery simulating a right apical lung mass. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978; 131(1):119-23. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.131.1.119. View

2.
Kinnaird T, Stabile E, Mintz G, Lee C, Canos D, Gevorkian N . Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 92(8):930-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00972-x. View

3.
Dehghani P, Mohammad A, Bajaj R, Hong T, Suen C, Sharieff W . Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2(11):1057-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.014. View

4.
Tahir H, Livesay J, Fogelson B, Coombes T, Patel C, Baljepally R . Use of the CHADS-VASc Score in Assessing Transradial Approach Failure. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021; 36:107-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.05.023. View

5.
Mason P, Shah B, Tamis-Holland J, Bittl J, Cohen M, Safirstein J . An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11(9):e000035. DOI: 10.1161/HCV.0000000000000035. View