» Articles » PMID: 37434931

Evaluating the Typing Power of Six Isoenzymatic Systems for Differentiation of Clinical and Standard Isolates of Candida Species

Overview
Journal Adv Biomed Res
Date 2023 Jul 12
PMID 37434931
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Due to the increasing prevalence of candidiasis, early detection of the causative agents may pave the way for the management of this infection. The present study aimed to assess the discriminative power of the six isoenzymatic systems for differentiating the species.

Materials And Methods: Sixteen standard and strains and 30 fluconazole-sensitive and fluconazole-resistant clinical strains of were analyzed using a Multilocus Enzyme Electrophoresis (MLEE) method, including six enzymatic systems consisting of malate dehydrogenase (MDH), phosphoglucomutase (PGM), glucose-phosphate isomerase (GPI), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD), and malic enzyme (ME).

Results: Among the six enzymatic systems, ME showed no diagnostic activity, whereas MDH provided the best species-specific pattern for species discrimination. In addition, the MDH and G6PD systems provided a discriminatory pattern for differentiating from isolates. The same isoenzymatic activity was detected in all 36 standard and clinical isolates. Moreover, the results showed no correlation between the isoenzymatic profiles and drug resistance.

Conclusion: Among the investigated MLEE systems, MDH was able to differentiate between and . Although no association was detected between isoenzyme patterns and fluconazole resistance in this investigation, isoenzyme patterns are likely correlated with virulence factors between species and even within species. To answer these questions, additional studies should be done on more strains.

References
1.
Arnavielhe S, De Meeus T, Blancard A, Mallie M, Renaud F, Bastide J . Multicentric genetic study of Candida albicans isolates from non-neutropenic patients using MLEE typing: population structure and mode of reproduction. Mycoses. 2000; 43(3-4):109-17. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0507.2000.00552.x. View

2.
Le Guennec R, Reynes J, Mallie M, Pujol C, Janbon F, Bastide J . Fluconazole- and itraconazole-resistant Candida albicans strains from AIDS patients: multilocus enzyme electrophoresis analysis and antifungal susceptibilities. J Clin Microbiol. 1995; 33(10):2732-7. PMC: 228565. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2732-2737.1995. View

3.
Boriollo M, Bassi R, dos Santos Nascimento C, Feliciano L, Francisco S, Barros L . Distribution and hydrolytic enzyme characteristics of Candida albicans strains isolated from diabetic patients and their non-diabetic consorts. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2009; 24(6):437-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2009.00524.x. View

4.
Boriollo M, Dias R, Fiorini J, de Mello Silva Oliveira N, Palomari Spolidorio D, de Souza H . Disparity between Multilocus Enzyme Electrophoresis, Microsatellite Markers and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis in epidemiological tracking of Candida albicans. J Microbiol Methods. 2010; 82(3):265-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.06.012. View

5.
Kilpatrick R, Scarrow E, Hornik C, Greenberg R . Neonatal invasive candidiasis: updates on clinical management and prevention. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021; 6(1):60-70. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00272-8. View