» Articles » PMID: 37434880

Acute Physiological, Perceived Exertion and Enjoyment Responses During a 4-week Basketball Training: a Small-sided Game Vs. High-intensity Interval Training

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2023 Jul 12
PMID 37434880
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Although previous research found that small-sided game (SSG) training was more enjoyable than high-intensity interval training (HIT) in various sports, no data were provided during longer training period in basketball. Furthermore, the comparison of internal loads between the two training approaches needs to be further examined. Thus, this study aimed to examine the acute physiological, perceived exertion and enjoyment responses during 4-week progressive basketball SSG or HIT programs.

Methods: Nineteen female collegiate basketball players were randomly assigned to two groups that performed either HIT ( = 10) or SSG ( = 9) 3 times per week for 4 continuous weeks. Average and percentage of maximal heart rate (HR and %HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and physical activity enjoyment (PACES) were determined during each training session.

Results: There was a main group effect in PACES ( < 0.001; = 0.44, moderate), and SSG had higher PACES than HIT in each week ( < 0.05). There were no significant interactions or main group effects in HR, %HR or RPE, but a main time effect was found in HR ( = 0.004; = 0.16, minimum), %HR ( < 0.001; = 0.25, minimum), and RPE ( < 0.001; = 0.31, moderate), respectively. In the SSG group, although no significant differences were found in HR responses, %HR was below 90% in week 1 and week 2. Accompanied with changes in %HR, RPE in week 1 and week 2 was lower than that in week 3 and week 4 ( < 0.05).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that SSG and HIT elicit similar acute HR response and RPE level, but SSG is perceived as more enjoyable and therefore it is more likely to increase exercise motivation and adherence comparing to HIT. Moreover, it seems that half-court, 2 vs. 2 SS Gtraining format with modified rules and lasting ≥ 7.5 min should be prescribed as an enjoyable training alternative to provide optimal cardiovascular stimuli (> 90% of HR) for female basketball players.

Citing Articles

Optimal Prescription for Superior Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of Inter-Individual Variability in Adaptations to Small-Sided Games and Short Sprint Interval Training in Young Basketball Players.

Xu H, Song J, Li G, Wang H J Sports Sci Med. 2024; 23(2):305-316.

PMID: 38841633 PMC: 11149073. DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2024.305.


Effects of small-sided games training programs on physiological and physical adaptations of youth basketball players: A systematic review.

Li T, Xu Q, Sarmento H, Zhao Y, Silva R, Clemente F Sci Prog. 2024; 107(1):368504241231657.

PMID: 38444385 PMC: 10916483. DOI: 10.1177/00368504241231657.

References
1.
Delextrat A, Martinez A . Small-sided game training improves aerobic capacity and technical skills in basketball players. Int J Sports Med. 2013; 35(5):385-91. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1349107. View

2.
Camacho P, Cruz D, Madinabeitia I, Gimenez F, Cardenas D . Time Constraint Increases Mental Load and Influences in the Performance in Small-Sided Games in Basketball. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2020; 92(3):443-452. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2020.1745138. View

3.
Reina M, Garcia-Rubio J, Ibanez S . Training and Competition Load in Female Basketball: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(8). PMC: 7215482. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17082639. View

4.
Ben Abdelkrim N, Castagna C, Jabri I, Battikh T, El Fazaa S, El Ati J . Activity profile and physiological requirements of junior elite basketball players in relation to aerobic-anaerobic fitness. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24(9):2330-42. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e381c1. View

5.
OGrady C, Fox J, Dalbo V, Scanlan A . A Systematic Review of the External and Internal Workloads Experienced During Games-Based Drills in Basketball Players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020; 15(5):603-616. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0785. View