» Articles » PMID: 37434703

Interplay Between Chromosomal Architecture and Termination of DNA Replication in Bacteria

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2023 Jul 12
PMID 37434703
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Faithful transmission of the genome from one generation to the next is key to life in all cellular organisms. In the majority of bacteria, the genome is comprised of a single circular chromosome that is normally replicated from a single origin, though additional genetic information may be encoded within much smaller extrachromosomal elements called plasmids. By contrast, the genome of a eukaryote is distributed across multiple linear chromosomes, each of which is replicated from multiple origins. The genomes of archaeal species are circular, but are predominantly replicated from multiple origins. In all three cases, replication is bidirectional and terminates when converging replication fork complexes merge and 'fuse' as replication of the chromosomal DNA is completed. While the mechanics of replication initiation are quite well understood, exactly what happens during termination is far from clear, although studies in bacterial and eukaryotic models over recent years have started to provide some insight. Bacterial models with a circular chromosome and a single bidirectional origin offer the distinct advantage that there is normally just one fusion event between two replication fork complexes as synthesis terminates. Moreover, whereas termination of replication appears to happen in many bacteria wherever forks happen to meet, termination in some bacterial species, including the well-studied bacteria and , is more restrictive and confined to a 'replication fork trap' region, making termination even more tractable. This region is defined by multiple genomic terminator () sites, which, if bound by specific terminator proteins, form unidirectional fork barriers. In this review we discuss a range of experimental results highlighting how the fork fusion process can trigger significant pathologies that interfere with the successful conclusion of DNA replication, how these pathologies might be resolved in bacteria without a fork trap system and how the acquisition of a fork trap might have provided an alternative and cleaner solution, thus explaining why in bacterial species that have acquired a fork trap system, this system is remarkably well maintained. Finally, we consider how eukaryotic cells can cope with a much-increased number of termination events.

Citing Articles

Escherichia coli DNA replication: the old model organism still holds many surprises.

Lazowski K, Woodgate R, Fijalkowska I FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2024; 48(4).

PMID: 38982189 PMC: 11253446. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuae018.


Spatio-temporal organization of the chromosome from base to cellular length scales.

Royzenblat S, Freddolino L EcoSal Plus. 2024; 12(1):eesp00012022.

PMID: 38864557 PMC: 11636183. DOI: 10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0001-2022.

References
1.
Levy O, Ptacin J, Pease P, Gore J, Eisen M, Bustamante C . Identification of oligonucleotide sequences that direct the movement of the Escherichia coli FtsK translocase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(49):17618-23. PMC: 1287487. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0508932102. View

2.
Alexander J, Orr-Weaver T . Replication fork instability and the consequences of fork collisions from rereplication. Genes Dev. 2016; 30(20):2241-2252. PMC: 5110991. DOI: 10.1101/gad.288142.116. View

3.
Hill T, Tecklenburg M, Pelletier A, KUEMPEL P . tus, the trans-acting gene required for termination of DNA replication in Escherichia coli, encodes a DNA-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989; 86(5):1593-7. PMC: 286744. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.5.1593. View

4.
Krabbe M, Zabielski J, Bernander R, Nordstrom K . Inactivation of the replication-termination system affects the replication mode and causes unstable maintenance of plasmid R1. Mol Microbiol. 1997; 24(4):723-35. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.3791747.x. View

5.
Hill T, Marians K . Escherichia coli Tus protein acts to arrest the progression of DNA replication forks in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990; 87(7):2481-5. PMC: 53713. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2481. View