» Articles » PMID: 37433893

Efficacy of Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Single-blinded, Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal J Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Jul 11
PMID 37433893
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is the most common subtype of SCA without effective treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) in a larger cohort of SCA3 patients.

Methods: One hundred and twenty patients with SCA3 were randomly assigned to the 3 groups: 40 patients in the 1 Hz rTMS, 40 in the iTBS and 40 in the sham group. Patients underwent 10 sessions of rTMS targeting the cerebellum delivering for 5 consecutive days per week for 2 weeks (a total of 1200 pulses per session). Primary outcomes included the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). Secondary outcomes included 10-m walking test (10MWT), nine-hole peg test (9-HPT), and PATA Rate Test (PRT). Outcome assessments were performed at baseline and on the last day of rTMS intervention.

Results: This study revealed that active rTMS outperformed sham in reducing the SARA and ICARS scores in SCA3 patients, but with no difference between the 1 Hz rTMS and iTBS protocol. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in SARA and ICARS scores between the mild and moderate to severe groups after the 1 Hz rTMS/iTBS therapy. Additionally, no severe adverse events were recorded in this study.

Conclusions: The study concluded that both 1 Hz rTMS and iTBS interventions targeting the cerebellum are effective to improve the symptoms of ataxia in patients with SCA3.

Citing Articles

Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Degenerative Cerebellar Ataxia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Matsugi A, Ohtsuka H, Bando K, Kondo Y, Kikuchi Y Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2024; 11(11):1323-1334.

PMID: 39221650 PMC: 11542298. DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.14205.


Effects of cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus physiotherapy in spinocerebellar ataxias - A randomized clinical trial.

Grobe-Einsler M, Bork F, Faikus A, Hurlemann R, Kaut O CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024; 30(6):e14797.

PMID: 38887169 PMC: 11183922. DOI: 10.1111/cns.14797.


Effect of Regional Brain Activity Following Repeat Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in SCA3: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Liu X, Zhang L, Xu H, Liu X, Sikandar A, Li M Cerebellum. 2024; 23(5):1923-1931.

PMID: 38558026 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-024-01689-8.

References
1.
Chen Z, Wang P, Wang C, Peng Y, Hou X, Zhou X . Updated frequency analysis of spinocerebellar ataxia in China. Brain. 2018; 141(4):e22. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy016. View

2.
Zesiewicz T, Wilmot G, Kuo S, Perlman S, Greenstein P, Ying S . Comprehensive systematic review summary: Treatment of cerebellar motor dysfunction and ataxia: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2018; 90(10):464-471. PMC: 5863491. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005055. View

3.
Latorre A, Rocchi L, Berardelli A, Bhatia K, Rothwell J . The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for movement disorders: A critical review. Mov Disord. 2019; 34(6):769-782. DOI: 10.1002/mds.27705. View

4.
Farzan F, Wu Y, Manor B, Anastasio E, Lough M, Novak V . Cerebellar TMS in treatment of a patient with cerebellar ataxia: evidence from clinical, biomechanics and neurophysiological assessments. Cerebellum. 2013; 12(5):707-12. PMC: 3951770. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-013-0485-8. View

5.
Grimaldi G, Argyropoulos G, Boehringer A, Celnik P, Edwards M, Ferrucci R . Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper. Cerebellum. 2013; 13(1):121-38. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-013-0514-7. View