A Novel Acute Discogenic Myelopathy Model Using Merocel Sponge: Comparison With Clip Compression Model in Rats

Overview

Journal Korean J Neurotrauma

Date 2023 Jul 11

PMID 37431382

Authors

Do-Hyung Kim

Ki-Bum Sim

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Animal models of spinal cord injuries (SCIs) use rats to simulate human SCIs. Among the various techniques, clips have been used to reproduce the compression-contusion model. However, the mechanism of injury in discogenic incomplete SCI may differ from that in clip injury; however, a model has yet to be established. Previously, we issued a patent (No. 10-2053770) for a rat SCI model using Merocel, a water-absorbing self-expanding polymer sponge. The objectives of this study were to compare the locomotor and histopathological changes between the Merocel-compression model (MC group) and clip compression model (clip group).

Methods: This study included 4 groups of rats: MC (n=30), MC-sham (n=5), clip (n=30), and clip-sham (n=5). Locomotor function was evaluated in all groups using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scoring system, 4 weeks after injury. Histopathological analyses included morphology, presence of inflammatory cells, microglial activation, and extent of neuronal damage, which were compared among the groups.

Results: The BBB scores in the MC group were significantly higher than those in the clip group throughout the 4 weeks (<0.01). Neuropathological changes in the MC group were significantly less severe than those in the clip group. In addition, motor neurons were well preserved in the ventral horn of the MC group but poorly preserved in the ventral horn of the clip group.

Conclusion: The novel MC group can help elucidate the pathophysiology of acute discogenic incomplete SCIs and may be applied in various SCI therapeutic strategies.

References

Abdullahi D, Ahmad Annuar A, Mohamad M, Aziz I, Sanusi J . Experimental spinal cord trauma: a review of mechanically induced spinal cord injury in rat models. Rev Neurosci. 2016; 28(1):15-20. DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2016-0050. View

Sun G, Chen Y, Zhou Z, Yang S, Zhong C, Li Z . A progressive compression model of thoracic spinal cord injury in mice: function assessment and pathological changes in spinal cord. Neural Regen Res. 2017; 12(8):1365-1374. PMC: 5607834. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.213693. View

Basso D, Beattie M, Bresnahan J . Graded histological and locomotor outcomes after spinal cord contusion using the NYU weight-drop device versus transection. Exp Neurol. 1996; 139(2):244-56. DOI: 10.1006/exnr.1996.0098. View

Jazayeri S, Firouzi M, Zadegan S, Saeedi N, Pirouz E, Nategh M . The effect of timing of decompression on neurologic recovery and histopathologic findings after spinal cord compression in a rat model. Acta Med Iran. 2013; 51(7):431-7. View

Koshinaga M, Whittemore S . The temporal and spatial activation of microglia in fiber tracts undergoing anterograde and retrograde degeneration following spinal cord lesion. J Neurotrauma. 1995; 12(2):209-22. DOI: 10.1089/neu.1995.12.209. View

Wen J, Sun D, Tan J, Young W . A consistent, quantifiable, and graded rat lumbosacral spinal cord injury model. J Neurotrauma. 2014; 32(12):875-92. PMC: 4492780. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3321. View

OPhelan K, Bunney E, Weingart S, Smith W . Emergency neurological life support: spinal cord compression (SCC). Neurocrit Care. 2012; 17 Suppl 1:S96-101. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-012-9756-3. View

Jeong J, Ahn M, Sim K, Moon C, Shin T . Immunohistochemical analysis of activin A expression in spinal cords of rats with clip compression injuries. Acta Histochem. 2014; 116(5):747-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2014.01.002. View

Schucht P, Raineteau O, Schwab M, Fouad K . Anatomical correlates of locomotor recovery following dorsal and ventral lesions of the rat spinal cord. Exp Neurol. 2002; 176(1):143-53. DOI: 10.1006/exnr.2002.7909. View

10.

Moon C, Heo S, Ahn M, Kim H, Shin M, Sim K . Immunohistochemical study of osteopontin in the spinal cords of rats with clip compression injury. J Vet Med Sci. 2004; 66(10):1307-10. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.66.1307. View

11.

Dusart I, Schwab M . Secondary cell death and the inflammatory reaction after dorsal hemisection of the rat spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci. 1994; 6(5):712-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1994.tb00983.x. View

12.

Nobunaga A, Go B, Karunas R . Recent demographic and injury trends in people served by the Model Spinal Cord Injury Care Systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80(11):1372-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90247-2. View

13.

Shin T . Increases in the phosphorylated form of caveolin-1 in the spinal cord of rats with clip compression injury. Brain Res. 2007; 1141:228-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.009. View

14.

Greenhalgh A, David S . Differences in the phagocytic response of microglia and peripheral macrophages after spinal cord injury and its effects on cell death. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(18):6316-22. PMC: 6608120. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4912-13.2014. View

15.

Shin T, Ahn M, Moon C, Kim S, Sim K . Alternatively activated macrophages in spinal cord injury and remission: another mechanism for repair?. Mol Neurobiol. 2013; 47(3):1011-9. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-013-8398-6. View

16.

Akhtar Anwar M, Al Shehabi T, Eid A . Inflammogenesis of Secondary Spinal Cord Injury. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016; 10:98. PMC: 4829593. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00098. View

17.

Kwon B, Oxland T, Tetzlaff W . Animal models used in spinal cord regeneration research. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(14):1504-10. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200207150-00005. View

18.

Poon P, Gupta D, Shoichet M, Tator C . Clip compression model is useful for thoracic spinal cord injuries: histologic and functional correlates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 32(25):2853-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b7e6b. View

19.

Amara S, JONAS V, Rosenfeld M, Ong E, Evans R . Alternative RNA processing in calcitonin gene expression generates mRNAs encoding different polypeptide products. Nature. 1982; 298(5871):240-4. DOI: 10.1038/298240a0. View

20.

Oudega M, Perez M . Corticospinal reorganization after spinal cord injury. J Physiol. 2012; 590(16):3647-63. PMC: 3476625. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.233189. View