» Articles » PMID: 37430517

Low-Cost, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction System with Integrated RNA Extraction

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Jul 11
PMID 37430517
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rapid, easy-to-use, and low-cost systems for biological sample testing are important for point-of-care diagnostics and various other health applications. The recent pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) showed an urgent need to rapidly and accurately identify the genetic material of SARS-CoV-2, an enveloped ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus, in upper respiratory specimens from people. In general, sensitive testing methods require genetic material extraction from the specimen. Unfortunately, current commercially available extraction kits are expensive and involve time-consuming and laborious extraction procedures. To overcome the difficulties associated with common extraction methods, we propose a simple enzymatic assay for the nucleic acid extraction step using heat mediation to improve the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reaction sensitivity. Our protocol was tested on Human Coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) as an example, which comes from the large family of viruses that affect birds, amphibians, and mammals, of which SARS-CoV-2 is a member. The proposed assay was performed using a low-cost, custom-made, real-time PCR system that incorporates thermal cycling and fluorescence detection. It had fully customizable reaction settings to allow versatile biological sample testing for various applications, including point-of-care medical diagnosis, food and water quality testing, and emergency health situations. Our results show that heat-mediated RNA extraction is a viable extraction method when compared to commercial extraction kits. Further, our study showed that extraction has a direct impact on purified laboratory samples of HCoV-229E, but no direct impact on infected human cells. This is clinically relevant, as it allows us to circumvent the extraction step on clinical samples when using PCR.

References
1.
Garibyan L, Avashia N . Polymerase chain reaction. J Invest Dermatol. 2013; 133(3):1-4. PMC: 4102308. DOI: 10.1038/jid.2013.1. View

2.
Schneegass I, Brautigam R, Kohler J . Miniaturized flow-through PCR with different template types in a silicon chip thermocycler. Lab Chip. 2004; 1(1):42-9. DOI: 10.1039/b103846j. View

3.
Bong C, Brasher C, Chikumba E, McDougall R, Mellin-Olsen J, Enright A . The COVID-19 Pandemic: Effects on Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Anesth Analg. 2020; 131(1):86-92. PMC: 7173081. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004846. View

4.
Heller L, Davis C, Peak K, Wingfield D, Cannons A, Amuso P . Comparison of methods for DNA isolation from food samples for detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69(3):1844-6. PMC: 150052. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1844-1846.2003. View

5.
Zhu H, Zhang H, Xu Y, Lassakova S, Korabecna M, Neuzil P . PCR past, present and future. Biotechniques. 2020; 69(4):317-325. PMC: 7439763. DOI: 10.2144/btn-2020-0057. View